Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25403613›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2014

Tuning of peroxiredoxin catalysis for various physiological roles.

Arden Perkins, Leslie B Poole, P Andrew Karplus

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacterial chemotaxis in human diseases.Trends in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Can thiol-based redox systems be utilized as parts for synthetic biology applications?Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Autonomous Non Antioxidant Roles forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Human PathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arden PerkinsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Leslie B Poole
P Andrew Karplus
Oregon State University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Mechanistic Studies of Alkyl Hydroperoxide Reductase and Related Redox SystemsR01GM050389 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI POOLE, LESLIE B · 1994 to 2013
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxiredoxins (Prxs) make up an ancient family of enzymes that are the predominant peroxidases for nearly all organisms and play essential roles in reducing hydrogen peroxide, organic hydroperoxides, and peroxynitrite. Even between distantly related organisms, the core protein fold and key catalytic residues related to its cysteine-based catalytic mechanism have been retained. Given that these enzymes appeared early in biology, Prxs have experienced more than 1 billion years of optimization for specific ecological niches. Although their basic enzymatic function remains the same, Prxs have diversified and are involved in roles such as protecting DNA against mutation, defending pathogens against host immune responses, suppressing tumor formation, and--for eukaryotes--helping regulate peroxide signaling via hyperoxidation of their catalytic Cys residues. Here, we review the current understanding of the physiological roles of Prxs by analyzing knockout and knockdown studies from ∼25 different species. We also review what is known about the structural basis for the sensitivity of some eukaryotic Prxs to inactivation by hyperoxidation. In considering the physiological relevance of hyperoxidation, we explore the distribution across species of sulfiredoxin (Srx), the enzyme responsible for rescuing hyperoxidized Prxs. We unexpectedly find that among eukaryotes appearing to have a "sensitive" Prx isoform, some do not contain Srx. Also, as Prxs are suggested to be promising targets for drug design, we discuss the rationale behind recently proposed strategies for their selective inhibition.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisAnimalsCysteineEnzyme ActivationEnzyme InhibitorsHumansIsoenzymesOxidation-ReductionOxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group DonorsPeroxiredoxinsPhylogenyProtein StabilitySubstrate SpecificityCysteineEnzyme InhibitorsIsoenzymesOxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group DonorsPeroxiredoxinsSRXN1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25403613
PMCPMC4270387
OpenAlexW2069282308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.