ArticlePediatric surgery international2015
Esophageal atresia and malrotation: what association?
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Malrotation and abdominal pain: A diagnosis eluding the unprepared mind.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEsophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) has an incidence of approximately 1:3,500. The incidence of malrotation is thought to be 1:200-500. We attempted to define the incidence of a combination and discuss the implications.
methodsThis was a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a single institution with a diagnosis of EA or EA/TEF or TEF between April 1981 and January 2013. Patients were included if the position of the duodeno-jejunal flexure (DJF) was determined by upper GI contrast study (UGIS), surgery or post-mortem.
resultsCase notes were reviewed for 235 patients. In the EA type A group, 3/28 (11 %; 95 % CI 3.7-27.2 %) had malrotation, significantly higher than the reported incidence of malrotation in the general population (p = 0.0008). All three patients in this group were symptomatic with one patient found to have a volvulus at emergency surgery. In the type C group, 6/196 (3 %, 95 % CI 1.4-6.5 %) had malrotation, significantly higher than the incidence reported for the general population (p = 0.0033) but not significantly different to that of the type A group (p = 0.0878). There were no patients with malrotation identified in any other EA/TEF type. In total, 9/235 (3.8 %; 95 % CI 2.0-7.2 %) patients with EA had malrotation, significantly higher than the 5/1,050 (0.48 %) reported for the general population (p = 0.0002).
conclusionThere is a high incidence of malrotation in patients with pure EA. In the type A group an attempt to identify the DJF position at gastrostomy siting and/or performance of UGIS in the neonatal period should be undertaken. There should also be a low threshold for UGIS in all EA/TEF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25403487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.