Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25403470›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2014

Protocol for the effect evaluation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS): a randomized controlled multicenter trial of IPS versus treatment as usual for patients with moderate to severe mental illness in Norway.

Vigdis Sveinsdottir, Camilla Løvvik, Tonje Fyhn, Karin Monstad, Kari Ludvigsen, Simon Øverland, Silje Endresen Reme

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01964092 nacompletednot on this map

Effect Evaluation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNORCE Norwegian Research Centre ASRan2013 to 2018Enrolled410ConditionsPsychosis, Substance Abuse, Depression, AnxietyArmsIndividual Placement and Support, Ordinary employment schemes
NCT03748004 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing the Employment Outcomes for People Living in the Downtown Eastside

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled72ConditionsBehavior, Adaptive, Mental Illness, Substance UseArmsIPS/SP, WorkBC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vigdis SveinsdottirUni Research Health, Uni Research, POB 7810, Bergen, NO-5020, Norway. vigdis.sveinsdottir@uni.no.
Camilla LøvvikUni Research Health, Uni Research, POB 7810, Bergen, NO-5020, Norway. camilla.lovvik@uni.no.
Tonje FyhnUni Research Health, Uni Research, POB 7810, Bergen, NO-5020, Norway. tonje.fyhn@uni.no.
Karin MonstadUni Rokkan Centre, Uni Research, Nygårdsgaten 5, Bergen, NO-5015, Norway. karin.monstad@uni.no.
Kari LudvigsenUni Rokkan Centre, Uni Research, Nygårdsgaten 5, Bergen, NO-5015, Norway. kari.ludvigsen@uni.no.
Simon ØverlandDepartment of Public Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, POB 4404, Oslo, NO-0403, Norway. simon.overland@fhi.no.
Silje Endresen RemeUni Research Health, Uni Research, POB 7810, Bergen, NO-5020, Norway. silje.reme@uni.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoughly one third of disability pensions in Norway are issued for mental and behavioral disorders, and vocational rehabilitation offered to this group has traditionally been dominated by train-and-place approaches with assisted or sheltered employment. Based on a more innovative place-and-train approach, Individual Placement and Support (IPS) involves supported employment in real-life competitive work settings, and has shown great promise for patients with severe mental illness. METHODS/

designThe study is a multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of IPS in a Norwegian context, involving an effect evaluation, a process evaluation, and a cost/benefit analysis. IPS will be compared to high quality treatment as usual (TAU), with labor market participation and educational activity at 12 months post inclusion as the primary outcome. The primary outcome will be measured using register data, and the project will also include complete follow-up up to 4 years after inclusion for long-term outcome data. Secondary outcomes include mental health status, disability and quality of life, collected through survey questionnaires at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months. Participants will include patients undergoing treatment for moderate to severe mental illness who are either unemployed or on sickness or social benefits. The estimated total sample size of 400-500 will be randomly assigned to the interventions. To be eligible, participants must have an expressed desire to work, and sufficient Norwegian reading and writing skills to fill out the questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The Effect Evaluation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) will be one of the largest randomized controlled trials to date investigating the effectiveness of IPS on competitive employment, and the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of IPS for patients with moderate to severe mental illness within a Norwegian context.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT01964092 . Registered October 16th, 2013.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEmployment, SupportedFocus GroupsHealth StatusHumansInterview, PsychologicalMental DisordersNorwayQuality of LifeRehabilitation, VocationalSample SizeSocial BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesUnemployment

Identifiers

PMID25403470
PMCPMC4244061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.