ArticleBMC systems biology2014
Parameter estimation of dynamic biological network models using integrated fluxes.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localization of Noise in Biochemical Networks.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Time Integrated Flux Analysis: Exploiting the Concentration Measurements Directly for Cost-Effective Metabolic Network Flux Analysis.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- A dynamic model of lignin biosynthesis inBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
- Identification of microbiota dynamics using robust parameter estimation methods.Mathematical biosciences · 2017Article
- The best models of metabolism.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2017Review
- Parameter estimation in large-scale systems biology models: a parallel and self-adaptive cooperative strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Identification of Metabolic Pathway Systems.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Effective Estimation of Dynamic Metabolic Fluxes Using (13)C Labeling and Piecewise Affine Approximation: From Theory to Practical Applicability.Metabolites · 2015Article
- Design Principles as a Guide for Constraint Based and Dynamic Modeling: Towards an Integrative Workflow.Metabolites · 2015Article
- REDEMPTION: reduced dimension ensemble modeling and parameter estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParameter estimation is often the bottlenecking step in biological system modeling. For ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, the challenge in this estimation has been attributed to not only the lack of parameter identifiability, but also computational issues such as finding globally optimal parameter estimates over highly multidimensional search space. Recent methods using incremental estimation approach could alleviate the computational difficulty by performing the parameter estimation one-reaction-at-a-time. However, incremental estimation strategies usually require data smoothing and are known to produce biased parameter estimates.
resultsIn this article, we presented a new parameter estimation method called integrated flux parameter estimation (IFPE). We employed the integral form of the ODE such that we could compute the integral of reaction fluxes from time-series concentration data without data smoothing. Here, we formulated the parameter estimation as a nested optimization problem. In the outer optimization, we performed a minimization of model prediction errors over parameters associated with a subset of reactions labeled as independent. The dimension of the independent reaction subset was equal to the degrees of freedom in the calculation of integrated fluxes (IF) from concentration data. We selected the independent reactions such that given their IF values, the IFs of the remaining (dependent) reactions could be uniquely determined. Meanwhile, in the inner optimization, we estimated the model parameters associated with the dependent reactions, one-reaction-at-a-time, by minimizing the dependent IF prediction errors. We demonstrated the performance of the IFPE method using two case studies: a generalized mass action model of a branched pathway and a lin-log ODE model of Lactococcus lactis glycolytic pathway.
conclusionsThe IFPE significantly outperformed standard simultaneous parameter estimation in terms of computational efficiency and scaling. In comparison to incremental parameter estimation (IPE) method, the IFPE produced parameter estimates with significantly lower bias and did not require time-series data smoothing. The advantages of IFPE over the IPE however came at the cost of a small increase in the computational time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.