ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2014
Reporting discrepancies between the clinicaltrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review with cross sectional comparative analysis identifies adverse event reporting discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov and published glaucoma randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Barriers and Innovations.Clinical breast cancer · 2019Pooled it
- The Virtual Biotech: A Multi-Agent AI Framework for Therapeutic Discovery and Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Incidence of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates-related cardiac events: a meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for brain metastases: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Targeted Therapies in Trial for Non-Resectable Gallbladder Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Review
- 10-Year Update on Study Results Submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov.The New England journal of medicine · 2019Article
- Current state of clinical trials in breast cancer brain metastases.Neuro-oncology practice · 2019Article
- Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for glioblastoma - analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Review
- Is research quality in orthopedic manual therapy trials stagnating? Reflections and pathways for improving research quality and advance our profession.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2016Article
- Portfolio of prospective clinical trials including brachytherapy: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Article
- Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles.BMC medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25402518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.