Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25402490›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Azathioprine versus beta interferons for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial.

Luca Massacesi, Irene Tramacere, Salvatore Amoroso, Mario A Battaglia, Maria Donata Benedetti, Graziella Filippini, Loredana La Mantia, Anna Repice, Alessandra Solari, Gioacchino Tedeschi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Azathioprine for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cancer risk for multiple sclerosis patients treated with azathioprine and disease-modifying therapies: an Italian observational study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Assessing measurement invariance of MSQOL-54 across Italian and English versions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  14. Neurobehçet, multiple sclerosis or overlap syndrome? A case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Luca MassacesiDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psicologia, Farmaco e Salute del Bambino Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy; Neurologia 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Irene TramacereFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Salvatore AmorosoDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione di Farmacologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Mario A BattagliaAssociazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (AISM), Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM), Genova, Italy.
Maria Donata BenedettiDipartimento Universitario di Neurologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Graziella FilippiniFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Loredana La MantiaUnità di Neurologia - Multiple Sclerosis Center, I.R.C.C.S. Santa Maria Nascente Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milano, Italy.
Anna RepiceNeurologia 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Alessandra SolariFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Gioacchino TedeschiClinica Neurologica, Università di Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
Clara MilaneseFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAssociazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledFor almost three decades in many countries azathioprine has been used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However its efficacy was usually considered marginal and following approval of β interferons for this indication it was no longer recommended as first line treatment, even if presently no conclusive direct β interferon-azathioprine comparison exists. To compare azathioprine efficacy versus the currently available β interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, non-inferiority trial was conducted in 30 Italian multiple sclerosis centers. Eligible patients (relapsing-remitting course; ≥ 2 relapses in the last 2 years) were randomly assigned to azathioprine or β interferons. The primary outcome was annualized relapse rate ratio (RR) over 2 years. Key secondary outcome was number of new brain MRI lesions. Patients (n = 150) were randomized in 2 groups (77 azathioprine, 73 β interferons). At 2 years, clinical evaluation was completed in 127 patients (62 azathioprine, 65 β interferons). Annualized relapse rate was 0.26 (95% Confidence Interval, CI, 0.19-0.37) in the azathioprine and 0.39 (95% CI 0.30-0.51) in the interferon group. Non-inferiority analysis showed that azathioprine was at least as effective as β interferons (relapse RRAZA/IFN 0.67, one-sided 95% CI 0.96; p<0.01). MRI outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients (50 azathioprine and 47 β interferons). Annualized new T2 lesion rate was 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.95) in the azathioprine and 0.69 (95% CI 0.54-0.88) in the interferon group. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were higher (20.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.03) in the azathioprine than in the interferon group, and concentrated within the first months of treatment, whereas in the interferon group discontinuations occurred mainly during the second year. The results of this study indicate that efficacy of azathioprine is not inferior to that of β interferons for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Considering also the convenience of the oral administration, and the low cost for health service providers, azathioprine may represent an alternative to interferon treatment, while the different side effect profiles of both medications have to be taken into account.

trial registrationEudraCT 2006-004937-13.

Indexed as

AdultAzathioprineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPrognosisRecurrenceSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultAzathioprineImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-beta

Identifiers

PMID25402490
PMCPMC4234663
OpenAlexW2037980570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.