Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25402485›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The efficacy of the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Didox in preclinical models of AML.

Guerry J Cook, David L Caudell, Howard L Elford, Timothy S Pardee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guerry J CookWake Forest University Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
David L CaudellDepartment of Pathology, Section of Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Howard L ElfordMolecules for Health, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Timothy S PardeeWake Forest University Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America; Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Wake Forest University · USMolecules for Health (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Metabolic contribution to cell viability and therapy resistance in the acuteK08CA169809 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARDEE, TIMOTHY SEBASTIAN · 2012 to 2016
$840k
NCI NIH HHS 1K08CA169809-01NCI NIH HHS K08 CA169809NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS P30CA012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy which leads to marrow failure, and ultimately death. There is a desperate need for new therapeutics for these patients. Ribonucleotide reductase (RR) is the rate limiting enzyme in DNA synthesis. Didox (3,4-Dihydroxybenzohydroxamic acid) is a novel RR inhibitor noted to be more potent than hydroxyurea. In this report we detail the activity and toxicity of Didox in preclinical models of AML. RR was present in all AML cell lines and primary patient samples tested. Didox was active against all human and murine AML lines tested with IC50 values in the low micromolar range (mean IC50 37 µM [range 25.89-52.70 µM]). It was active against primary patient samples at concentrations that did not affect normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Didox exposure resulted in DNA damage and p53 induction culminating in apoptosis. In syngeneic, therapy-resistant AML models, single agent Didox treatment resulted in a significant reduction in leukemia burden and a survival benefit. Didox was well tolerated, as marrow from treated animals was morphologically indistinguishable from controls. Didox exposure at levels that impaired leukemia growth did not inhibit normal HSC engraftment. In summary, Didox was well tolerated and effective against preclinical models of AML.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisDisease Models, AnimalDNA DamageDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansHydroxamic AcidsKaryotype3,4-dihydroxybenzohydroxamic acidAntineoplastic AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsRibonucleotide ReductasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25402485
PMCPMC4234372
OpenAlexW2024138863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.