Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25401794›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Photoimmunotherapy of gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model.

Kazuhide Sato, Peter L Choyke, Hisataka Kobayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phototherapy in cancer treatment: strategies and challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhide SatoMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States of America.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States of America.
Hisataka KobayashiMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States of America.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Cancer-cell specific therapy: photo-immunotherapyZIABC011513 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KOBAYASHI, HISATAKA · 2013 to 2025
$15.5M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) is a new cancer treatment that combines the specificity of antibodies for targeting tumors with the toxicity induced by photosensitizers after exposure to near infrared (NIR) light. We performed PIT in a model of disseminated gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis and monitored efficacy with in vivo GFP fluorescence imaging. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted with a HER2-expressing, GFP-expressing, gastric cancer cell line (N87-GFP). A conjugate comprised of a photosensitizer, IR-700, conjugated to trastuzumab (tra-IR700), followed by NIR light was used for PIT. In vitro PIT was evaluated by measuring cytotoxicity with dead staining and a decrease in GFP fluorescence. In vivo PIT was evaluated in a disseminated peritoneal carcinomatosis model and a flank xenograft using tumor volume measurements and GFP fluorescence intensity. In vivo anti-tumor effects of PIT were confirmed by significant reductions in tumor volume (at day 15, p<0.0001 vs. control) and GFP fluorescence intensity (flank model: at day 3, PIT treated vs. control p<0.01 and peritoneal disseminated model: at day 3 PIT treated vs. control, p<0.05). Cytotoxic effects in vitro were shown to be dependent on the light dose and caused necrotic cell rupture leading to GFP release and a decrease in fluorescence intensity in vitro. Thus, loss of GFP fluorescence served as a useful biomarker of cell necrosis after PIT.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyPhototherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell ProliferationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiceMice, NudeAntineoplastic AgentsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImmunoconjugatesPhotosensitizing AgentsTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID25401794
PMCPMC4234664
OpenAlexW2022151087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.