Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25401793›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2014

Differential focal and nonfocal prospective memory accuracy in a demographically diverse group of nondemented community-dwelling older adults.

Susan Y Chi, Laura A Rabin, Avner Aronov, Joshua Fogel, Ashu Kapoor, Cuiling Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06539403 (Thinking About Memory), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06539403 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Thinking About Memory: How Confident Are You in Your Memory, and Does it Change With Age? Investigating Memory Ability and Confidence in Those Attending Memory Clinics.

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2024 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Subjective Cognitive DeclineArmsMemory tasks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan Y Chi1Department of Psychology,Queens College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York,Flushing,New York.
Laura A Rabin1Department of Psychology,Queens College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York,Flushing,New York.
Avner Aronov2Department of Psychology,Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York,Brooklyn,New York.
Joshua Fogel4Department of Finance and Business Management,Brooklyn College of the City University of New York,Brooklyn,New York.
Ashu Kapoor1Department of Psychology,Queens College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York,Flushing,New York.
Cuiling Wang3Department of Neurology,Albert Einstein College of Medicine,Bronx,New York.

Funding

Vascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI Richard B. LIPTON · 1985 to 2026
$73.9M
Cognitive Complaints in a Diverse Cohort of Elders: Novel Assessment ApproachesSC2AG039235 · NIA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI RABIN, LAURA A. · 2010 to 2012
$459k
NIA NIH HHS AG03949NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003949NIA NIH HHS SC2 AG039235NIA NIH HHS SC2AG039235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prospective memory (PM) is compromised in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), it is unclear which specific cognitive processes underlie these PM difficulties. We investigated older adults' performance on a computerized event-based focal versus nonfocal PM task that made varying demands on the amount of attentional control required to support intention retrieval. Participants were nondemented individuals (mean age=81.8 years; female=66.1%) enrolled in a community-based longitudinal study, including those with amnestic MCI (aMCI), nonamnestic MCI (naMCI), subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and healthy controls (HC). Participants included in the primary analysis (n=189) completed the PM task and recalled and/or recognized both focal and nonfocal PM cues presented in the task. Participants and their informants also completed a questionnaire assessing everyday PM failures. Relative to HC, those with aMCI and naMCI were significantly impaired in focal PM accuracy (p<.05). In a follow-up analysis that included 13 additional participants who successfully recalled and/or recognized at least one of the two PM cues, the naMCI group showed deficits in nonfocal PM accuracy (p<.05). There was a significant negative correlation between informant reports of PM difficulties and nonfocal PM accuracy (p<.01). PM failures in aMCI may be primarily related to impairment of spontaneous retrieval processes associated with the medial temporal lobe system, while PM failures in naMCI potentially indicate additional deficits in executive control functions and prefrontal systems. The observed focal versus nonfocal PM performance profiles in aMCI and naMCI may constitute specific behavioral markers of PM decline that result from compromise of separate neurocognitive systems.

Indexed as

MemoryMemory, EpisodicResidence CharacteristicsAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAnalysis of VarianceAssociation LearningCognition DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25401793
PMCPMC4624305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.