Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25401467›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2014

The plastic liver: differentiated cells, stem cells, every cell?

Christopher J Hindley, Gianmarco Mastrogiovanni, Meritxell Huch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Next-Generation Liver Medicine Using Organoid Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  5. YAP Activation Drives Liver Regeneration after Cholestatic Damage Induced byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Road to stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  9. Immunological aspects of liver cell transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher J Hindley
Gianmarco Mastrogiovanni
Meritxell Huch
Wellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092096Wellcome Trust 104151Wellcome Trust 104151/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is capable of full regeneration following several types and rounds of injury, ranging from hepatectomy to toxin-mediated damage. The source of this regenerative capacity has long been a hotly debated topic. The damage response that occurs when hepatocyte proliferation is impaired is thought to be mediated by oval/dedifferentiated progenitor cells, which replenish the hepatocyte and ductal compartments of the liver. Recently, reports have questioned whether these oval/progenitor cells truly serve as the facultative stem cell of the liver following toxin-mediated damage. In this issue of the JCI, Kordes and colleagues use lineage tracing to follow transplanted rat hepatic stellate cells, a resident liver mesenchymal cell population, in hosts that have suffered liver damage. Transplanted stellate cells repopulated the damaged rat liver by contributing to the oval cell response. These data establish yet another cell type of mesenchymal origin as the progenitor for the oval/ductular response in the rat. The lack of uniformity between different damage models, the extent of the injury to the liver parenchyma, and potential species-specific differences might be at the core of the discrepancy between different studies. Taken together, these data imply a considerable degree of plasticity in the liver, whereby several cell types can contribute to regeneration.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationHepatic Stellate CellsLiver RegenerationMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsLiver

Identifiers

PMID25401467
PMCPMC4348964
OpenAlexW2090171266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.