Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25400960›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncological medicine2014

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation for curative treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Arpit Chhabra, David Schwartz, Andrea Leaf, Nikolaos Karanikolas, Jeffrey P Weiss, David Schreiber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncological medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Penile cancer: a Brazilian consensus statement for low- and middle-income countries.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arpit ChhabraDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA ; Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-0914
David SchwartzDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA ; Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Andrea LeafDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA.
Nikolaos KaranikolasDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA.
Jeffrey P WeissDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA ; Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
David SchreiberDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Suite 114A, Brooklyn, NY 11209, USA ; Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
State University of New York · USVA NY Harbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Penile cancer is a rare malignancy often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, the utility of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, particularly when the tumor is resistant to chemotherapy alone, has not been established. In this study, we report a case of pT3cN3M0 penile squamous cell carcinoma with progression of nodal disease on chemotherapy, which was cured with use of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation. Case Report. A 65-year-old male presented with a fixed left inguinal lymph node with associated firmness of the penile glans. Biopsies of both sites revealed evidence of squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent partial penectomy for the primary lesion and began neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the size of the unresectable left inguinal node. However, he displayed disease progression in the left inguinal node. As such, we attempted concurrent chemoradiation therapy with regression of his nodal disease. The patient was able to undergo left inguinal node dissection and has no evidence of disease 18 months since his initial surgery. Conclusion. The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for bulky cN2-3 disease seems appropriate in the setting of progressive disease. Further studies are necessary to assess the utility of concurrent chemoradiation both in the neoadjuvant and salvage setting.

Identifiers

PMID25400960
PMCPMC4220572
OpenAlexW1991585765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.