Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25400938›Full record

ArticleOA molecular oncology2013

The molecular genomics of metastatic brain tumours.

A Bollig-Fischer, Sk Michelhaugh, R Ali-Fehmi, S Mittal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OA molecular oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An Insight into Molecular Targets of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Foe or friend? Janus-faces of the neurovascular unit in the formation of brain metastases.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Bollig-FischerBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA ; Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sk MichelhaughDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
R Ali-FehmiBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA ; Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
S MittalBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA ; Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Enhancing neoadjuvant chemotherpay responses with targeted T cellsR01CA140314 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BEPLER, GEROLD · 2010 to 2015
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMetastatic brain tumours remain an intractable clinical problem despite notable advances in the treatment of the primary cancers. It is estimated that 30-40% of breast and lung cancer patients will develop brain metastases. Typically, brain lesions are not diagnosed until patients exhibit neurological symptoms because there are currently no tests that can predict which patients will be afflicted. Brain metastases are resistant to current chemotherapies, and despite surgical resection and radiotherapy, the prognosis for these patients remains very poor with an average survival of only 6-9 months. Cancer is ultimately a genetic disease, involving patient genetics and aberrant tumour genomics; therefore the pursuit of an explanation for why or how brain metastases occur requires investigation of the associated somatic mutations. In this article, we review the current literature surrounding the molecular and genome-based mechanistic evidence to indicate driver oncogenes that hold potential biomarkers for risk, or therapeutic targets for treatment of brain metastases.

conclusionPatients afflicted with metastatic brain tumours are in dire need of more effective therapies, and clinicians need predictive laboratory tests to identify patients at risk of developing metastatic brain tumours. The as yet unrealized comprehensive analysis of metastatic brain tumour genomics is necessary to meet these needs. Moreover, without improved understanding of the genomic aberrations that drive metastatic brain tumours, development of biomarkers and molecularly targeted therapies will remain stalled and patient outcomes will continue to be dismal.

Identifiers

PMID25400938
PMCPMC4229688
OpenAlexW2131444208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.