Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25400788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Yifang Jia, Heyong Zhao, Donghong Shi, Wen Peng, Luwen Xie, Wei Wang, Fuman Jiang, Hongyun Zhang, Xietong Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identification ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Advances in the application of high-throughput sequencing in clinical genetics].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yifang JiaShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Heyong ZhaoShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China ; Zibo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Zibo, Shandong, China.
Donghong ShiShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wen PengShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Luwen XieShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wei WangBGI Shenzhen, China.
Fuman JiangBGI Shenzhen, China.
Hongyun ZhangBGI Shenzhen, China.
Xietong WangShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdeletions of chromosome 13q31.1 are relatively rare. These types of deletions may cause different genetic effects on genotypes and/or phenotypes. There are several ways to detect microdeletions; noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the newest detection method. In this study, we aimed to investigate the genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by NIPT and to reconfirm the feasibility of this procedure in predicting sub-chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs). The 13q31.1 microdeletion, which has previously been described as a disease-associated fragment, was detected by NIPT in a pregnant woman. To validate the finding and to explain the origin of this sub-chromosomal CNV, we collected fetal amniotic fluid and parental blood samples and tested the samples using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Karyotype analysis was performed on all of the samples to rule out balanced or mosaic anomalies. The aCGH results confirmed the NIPT findings. We detected the same type of microdeletion in the fetus and the mother via aCGH. The mother had a normal phenotype; therefore, in a post-test genetic counseling session, we predicted a normal phenotype for the fetus. After delivery, the normal phenotype of the newborn confirmed our prediction. Based on the present study, this 13q31.1 microdeletion may be considered as a chromosomal polymorphism. This study also reconfirmed the feasibility of obtaining a molecular karyotype of a fetus via NIPT.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 13Genetic TestingAmniotic FluidChromosome DisordersComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansKaryotypeLive BirthPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisReproducibility of Results13q31.1AcghMicrodeletion/microduplicationNIPTprenatal diagnosisSLITRK1SLITRK6

Identifiers

PMID25400788
PMCPMC4230093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.