Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25400752›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Prognostic value of p53 alterations in human osteosarcoma: a meta analysis.

Dong Yao, Guo-Hong Cai, Jing Chen, Rui Ling, Sheng-Xi Wu, Yong-Ping Li

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. TP53 in bone and soft tissue sarcomas.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong YaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Corps Hospital of The Chinese People's Armed Police Force 36 Shifan Street, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China ; Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology & K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, Preclinical School of Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Guo-Hong CaiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology & K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, Preclinical School of Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology & K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, Preclinical School of Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Rui LingDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Sheng-Xi WuDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology & K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, Preclinical School of Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Yong-Ping LiDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an 710032, PR China.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor suppressor gene p53 functions as the guardian of the human genome and mutations in p53 contribute to cancer development. However, studies that investigated the potential of p53 as a prognostic marker in osteosarcoma patients have yielded inconclusive results. Based on recommendation of the Cochrane Collaboration, this meta-analysis was conducted using data from the 17 published studies to evaluate the association of p53 alterations with clinical outcome of osteosarcoma patients. Different databases, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Prognostic value of p53 alterations was determined by risk ratio (RR). The data showed that p53-positive immunostaining tended to associate with decreased 2-year survival rates (RR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.64; p < 0.0001, I(2) = 10%). However, the prediction value of RR was smaller with p53 expression than with p53 mutations. Moreover, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery tended to have a stronger association between p53-positive staining and 2-year mortality compared to the patients treated with surgery only. However, p53-positive staining was not associated with 3-year (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.84 to 3.20; P = 0.15; I(2) = 56%) and 5-year survival (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.01; P = 0.36; I(2) = 70%). The data from the current study suggest that p53-positive osteosarcoma only predicted a decreased short-term survival rate, but not 3- or 5-year survival.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChi-Square DistributionHumansOdds RatioOsteosarcomaPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53meta-analysisosteosarcomap53survival

Identifiers

PMID25400752
PMCPMC4230122
OpenAlexW2206862697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.