ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2014
Method and software for using m-sequences to characterize parallel components of higher-order visual tracking behavior in Drosophila.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical temporal integration can account for limits of temporal perception: investigations in the binaural system.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Opsin1 regulates light-evoked avoidance behavior in Aedes albopictus.BMC biology · 2022Article
- High-speed imaging of light-induced photoreceptor microsaccades in compound eyes.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The impulse response of optic flow-sensitive descending neurons to roll m-sequences.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Fly eyes are not still: a motion illusion inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Visuomotor strategies for object approach and aversion inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2019Article
- Neurons forming optic glomeruli compute figure-ground discriminations in Drosophila.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of impulse responses to figure motion in optic flow neurons.PloS one · 2015Article
- Editorial: What can simple brains teach us about how vision works.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A moving visual figure may contain first-order signals defined by variation in mean luminance, as well as second-order signals defined by constant mean luminance and variation in luminance envelope, or higher-order signals that cannot be estimated by taking higher moments of the luminance distribution. Separating these properties of a moving figure to experimentally probe the visual subsystems that encode them is technically challenging and has resulted in debated mechanisms of visual object detection by flies. Our prior work took a white noise systems identification approach using a commercially available electronic display system to characterize the spatial variation in the temporal dynamics of two distinct subsystems for first- and higher-order components of visual figure tracking. The method relied on the use of single pixel displacements of two visual stimuli according to two binary maximum length shift register sequences (m-sequences) and cross-correlation of each m-sequence with time-varying flight steering measurements. The resultant spatio-temporal action fields represent temporal impulse responses parameterized by the azimuthal location of the visual figure, one STAF for first-order and another for higher-order components of compound stimuli. Here we review m-sequence and reverse correlation procedures, then describe our application in detail, provide Matlab code, validate the STAFs, and demonstrate the utility and robustness of STAFs by predicting the results of other published experimental procedures. This method has demonstrated how two relatively modest innovations on classical white noise analysis--the inclusion of space as a way to organize response kernels and the use of linear decoupling to measure the response to two channels of visual information simultaneously--could substantially improve our basic understanding of visual processing in the fly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.