ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2015
Socio-economic dietary inequalities in UK adults: an updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data.
Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.The Lancet. Global health · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of increasing the relative availability of meat-free options on food selection: two natural field experiments and an online randomised trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- Impact of increasing the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy food on food selection: a randomised laboratory experiment.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Mediators and moderators of nutrition intervention effects in remote Indigenous Australia.The British journal of nutrition · 2018Trial
- Effect of snack-food proximity on intake in general population samples with higher and lower cognitive resource.Appetite · 2018Trial
- Why don't poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption.Appetite · 2015Trial
- De novo cancer-related mortality after solid organ transplantation in England: the EpCOT study.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Adherence to the Eatwell Guide and associations with markers of physical function: a prospective analysis within the UK Biobank cohort.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Is there a healthy-food premium? A cross-sectional analysis of the UK online food delivery sector.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Socio-Demographic Variation in Adherence to the Eatwell Guide Within the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort Study.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Article
- Creating health-promoting spaces for change within the economy: the role of food co-operatives in England.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Status, lifestyle factors, and lipid profiles: a comprehensive analysis of cardiovascular risk factors in the UK biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Perceived barriers to adopting more plant-based diets across sociodemographic groups: findings from a population-based survey in Finland.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
- Widening educational inequalities in type 2 diabetes risk and mediators across successive generations: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- What Is Known About the Fish Intake of People Living in Disadvantaged Communities in the UK? A Scoping Review.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Article
- A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Dietary Intake in University Students from the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Fruit and vegetable intake in minority ethnic groups in the UK: analysis from 'Understanding Society' and UK Biobank.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Frailty-free life expectancy and its association with socio-economic characteristics: an analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing cohort study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Socio-economic differences in diet are a potential contributor to health inequalities. The present study provides an up-to-date picture of socio-economic differences in diet in the UK, focusing on the consumption of three food groups and two nutrients of public health concern: fruit and vegetables; red and processed meat; oily fish; saturated fats; non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES). We analysed data for 1491 adults (age ≥ 19 years) from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008-2011. Socio-economic indicators were household income, occupational social class and highest educational qualification. Covariate-adjusted estimates for intakes of fruit and vegetables, red and processed meat, and both nutrients were estimated using general linear models. Covariate-adjusted OR for oily fish consumption were derived with logistic regression models. We observed consistent socio-economic gradients in the consumption of the three food groups as estimated by all the three indicators. Contrasting highest and lowest levels of each socio-economic indicator, we observed significant differences in intakes for the three food groups and NMES. Depending on the socio-economic indicator, highest socio-economic groups consumed up to 128 g/d more fruit and vegetables, 26 g/d less red and processed meat, and 2·6% points less NMES (P< 0·05 for all). Relative to lowest socio-economic groups, highest socio-economic groups were 2·4 to 4·0 times more likely to eat oily fish. No significant patterns in saturated fat consumption were apparent. In conclusion, socio-economic differences were identified in the consumption of food groups and one nutrient of public health importance. Aligning dietary intakes with public health guidance may require interventions specifically designed to reduce health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.