Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2014
Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 599 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of 12 Versus 30 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Subjects Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Either Drug-eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the ANgiolite Drug-Eluting Stent: an Optical CoHerence TOmogRaphy Study. The ANCHOR Study
Outcome of CHAllenging lesioNs and Patients Treated With Polymer Free Drug-CoatEd Stent ("Biofreedom"): the CHANCE a Multicenter Study
Randomized Active-Controlled Trial Evaluating Fexuprazan for Prevention Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in High Bleeding Risk Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention-Fexuprazan for Patients With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Trial
Who cites it
599 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,875 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Aspirin versus ticagrelor for the management after coronary revascularization - a systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomised trials'.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Antiplatelet dilemma: Clopidogrel or aspirin for long-term cardiovascular protection after dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Correlation between hypertension and restenosis after endovascular therapy: a meta-analysis based on a derived cohort from randomized trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Patients With a History of Angioplasty. When is Aspirin Not Enough? A Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- P2YBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with established coronary atherosclerotic disease.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2023Pooled it
- Managing Anticoagulation and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Active Bleed or Upcoming Procedure: A Scoping Review.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Different Chronic Maintenance Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety outcomes of long-term anti-thrombotic treatment of chronic coronary artery disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Secondary prevention of antithrombotic therapy in patients with stable cardiovascular disease at high ischemic risk: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Net clinical benefit of extended dual pathway inhibition in chronic coronary syndrome as classified by the 2024 ESC criteria: a COMPASS substudy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Trial
- Three vs 12-month DAPT after implantation of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent: a randomised clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel inRenal failure · 2025Trial
- Association Between Claims-Defined Frailty and Outcomes Following 30 Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings From the EXTEND-DAPT Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Prior Myocardial Infarction and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Post-hoc Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
539 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 16 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDual antiplatelet therapy is recommended after coronary stenting to prevent thrombotic complications, yet the benefits and risks of treatment beyond 1 year are uncertain.
methodsPatients were enrolled after they had undergone a coronary stent procedure in which a drug-eluting stent was placed. After 12 months of treatment with a thienopyridine drug (clopidogrel or prasugrel) and aspirin, patients were randomly assigned to continue receiving thienopyridine treatment or to receive placebo for another 18 months; all patients continued receiving aspirin. The coprimary efficacy end points were stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) during the period from 12 to 30 months. The primary safety end point was moderate or severe bleeding.
resultsA total of 9961 patients were randomly assigned to continue thienopyridine treatment or to receive placebo. Continued treatment with thienopyridine, as compared with placebo, reduced the rates of stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.4%; hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.17 to 0.48]; P<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (4.3% vs. 5.9%; hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85]; P<0.001). The rate of myocardial infarction was lower with thienopyridine treatment than with placebo (2.1% vs. 4.1%; hazard ratio, 0.47; P<0.001). The rate of death from any cause was 2.0% in the group that continued thienopyridine therapy and 1.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.85]; P=0.05). The rate of moderate or severe bleeding was increased with continued thienopyridine treatment (2.5% vs. 1.6%, P=0.001). An elevated risk of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction was observed in both groups during the 3 months after discontinuation of thienopyridine treatment.
conclusionsDual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after placement of a drug-eluting stent, as compared with aspirin therapy alone, significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. (Funded by a consortium of eight device and drug manufacturers and others; DAPT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00977938.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.