Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25399552›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2015

Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation.

Caroline Robert, Georgina V Long, Benjamin Brady, Caroline Dutriaux, Michele Maio, Laurent Mortier, Jessica C Hassel, Piotr Rutkowski, Catriona McNeil, Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha and 18 more

7 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2,866 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,866citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
239.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01721772 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of BMS-936558 vs Dacarbazine in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2013 to 2021Enrolled418ConditionsMelanomaArmsBMS-936558 (Nivolumab), Placebo matching BMS-936558 (Nivolumab), Dacarbazine, Placebo matching Dacarbazine
NCT03700905 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase III Study of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab as Immunotherapy vs Standard Follow-up in Surgical Resectable HNSCC After Adjuvant Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2018 to 2024Enrolled276ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsSurgical resection of primary tumor, Adjuvant radio(-chemo)therapy, Neoadjuvant Nivolumab, Adjuvant Nivolumab, Adjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab
NCT03817125 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Phase 1b Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Microbiome Study Intervention Administration in Combination With Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Adult Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyRan2019 to 2022Enrolled14ConditionsMetastatic MelanomaArmsPlacebo for antibiotic, Vancomycin pretreatment, Nivolumab, Matching Placebo for SER-401, SER-401
NCT04186013 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Atezolizumab Concurrent With Radiotherapy in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder cáncer (Study ATEZOBLADDERPRESERVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpanish Oncology Genito-Urinary GroupRan2019 to 2027Enrolled39ConditionsBladder CancerArmsAtezolizumab Injection [Tecentriq], External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT)
NCT04663126 early_phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility of IV Injected Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like Tumour Associated Macrophages in Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohn O. PriorRan2021 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsMelanomaArmsTc-99m tilmanocept
NCT06566391 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Primary Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Combo-immunotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab in Locally Advanced or Limited Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2019 to 2024Enrolled35ConditionsMelanomaArmsIpilimumab
NCT07174453 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Late Phase Randomized Open-Label Multi Cohort Trial to Evaluate irAEs With Different Standard of Care Dosing Strategies of Standard of Care Immunotherapies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled192ConditionsSolid Tumor MalignanciesArmsNivolumab, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,866 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5,312 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Circulating Thymidine Kinase Activity Predicts Survival and Optimal Treatment Sequencing in BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma in the SECOMBIT Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  6. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Efficacy from a First-in-Human Study of Volrustomig, a Novel PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. RP1 Combined With Nivolumab in Advanced Anti-PD-1-Failed Melanoma (IGNYTE).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab for Untreated Melanoma Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,806 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Caroline RobertThe authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
Georgina V Long
Benjamin Brady
Caroline Dutriaux
Michele Maio
Laurent Mortier
Jessica C Hassel
Piotr Rutkowski
Catriona McNeil
Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha
Kerry J Savage
Micaela M Hernberg
Celeste Lebbé
Julie Charles
Catalin Mihalcioiu
Vanna Chiarion-Sileni
Cornelia Mauch
Francesco Cognetti
Ana Arance
Henrik Schmidt
Dirk Schadendorf
Helen Gogas
Lotta Lundgren-Eriksson
Christine Horak
Brian Sharkey
Ian M Waxman
Victoria Atkinson
Paolo A Ascierto
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USMelanoma Institute Australia · AUAarhus University Hospital · DKAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBC Cancer Agency · CACabrini Hospital · AUCentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DEGreenslopes Private Hospital · AUHelsinki University Hospital · FIHôpital Claude Huriez · FRHôpital Saint-André · FRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESInserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNational Center for Tumor Diseases · DERoyal Victoria Hospital · CAThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study.

methodsWe randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival.

resultsAt 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine.

conclusionsNivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanDacarbazineNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID25399552
OpenAlexW2128035403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.