Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25399429›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2014

Sterilization of Chrysomya putoria (Insecta: Diptera: Calliphoridae) eggs for use in biotherapy.

Daniele Lourinho Dallavecchia, Renato Geraldo da Silva Filho, Valéria Magalhães Aguiar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Investigation of antimicrobial effects of treatedIranian journal of microbiology · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniele Lourinho DallavecchiaLaboratory of Diptera Studies of the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Post-graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Neotropical Biodiversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil danieledallavecchia@gmail.com.
Renato Geraldo da Silva FilhoLaboratory of Diptera Studies of the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Post-graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Neotropical Biodiversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Valéria Magalhães AguiarLaboratory of Diptera Studies of the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Post-graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Neotropical Biodiversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale, quality-controlled laboratory production of fly larvae is needed for biotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess the action of glutaraldehyde on the sterilization of Chrysomya putoria eggs by applying pharmaceutical sterility tests. Egg masses with 0.600 g were divided into three parts of 0.200 g, the eggs were separated using sterile distilled water, and the suspensions obtained were mixed with activated 2% glutaraldehyde solution. After 15-min contact, the suspensions were filtered through Whatman filter paper, and the glutaraldehyde residue obtained in the filtrate was neutralized by rinsing with Tryptone Soy Broth. The treated eggs were placed aseptically on Petri dishes containing gauze moistened with sterile saline solution. About 10% of the sterilized mass was transferred to test tubes containing Tryptone Soy Broth and Fluid Thioglycollate Broth. The tubes were incubated, respectively, at 22.5 and 35.0°C for 14 d to verify egg mass sterility. The plates containing the rest of the eggs (90%) were sealed with plastic film and kept in a climatized chamber at 30°C/d, 28°C per night, 60 ± 10% relative humidity, and under a 12-h light period to assess insect viability and survival. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate using a biological class II safety cabinet. No change in color or turgidity was observed with the agent tested, proving the sterility of the product and that there was no trace of contamination. Forty larvae (in three replications) in the periods of 12, 24, and 48 h after sterilization, when transferred to diet, produced larvae, pupae, and total viability similar to the control (larvae without sterilization). However, for the 72-h treatment, larvae and total viability were significantly lower than for the other treatments. There was no significant difference for the pupal stage. The product tested was shown to be efficacious for use as a sterilizer of C. putoria eggs for all the parameters assessed.

Indexed as

DipteraDisinfectantsGlutaralSterilizationAnimalsBiological TherapyDebridementOvumDisinfectantsGlutaralglutaraldehyde treatmentlarval therapyscrew wormsterility testwound

Identifiers

PMID25399429
PMCPMC5633979
OpenAlexW2089981387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.