Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25399309›Full record

ReviewExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2015

Improved cultivation and metagenomics as new tools for bioprospecting in cold environments.

Jan Kjølhede Vester, Mikkel Andreas Glaring, Peter Stougaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A review of neural networks for metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Marine-derived Compounds: A Powerful Platform for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Industrial Biotechnology Based on Enzymes From Extreme Environments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Aspects and Recent Trends in Microbial α-Amylase: a Review.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan Kjølhede VesterDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark, jkv@plen.ku.dk.
Mikkel Andreas Glaring
Peter Stougaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a small minority of microorganisms from an environmental sample can be cultured in the laboratory leaving the enormous bioprospecting potential of the uncultured diversity unexplored. This resource can be accessed by improved cultivation methods in which the natural environment is brought into the laboratory or through metagenomic approaches where culture-independent DNA sequence information can be combined with functional screening. The coupling of these two approaches circumvents the need for pure, cultured isolates and can be used to generate targeted information on communities enriched for specific activities or properties. Bioprospecting in extreme environments is often associated with additional challenges such as low biomass, slow cell growth, complex sample matrices, restricted access, and problematic in situ analyses. In addition, the choice of vector system and expression host may be limited as few hosts are available for expression of genes with extremophilic properties. This review summarizes the methods developed for improved cultivation as well as the metagenomic approaches for bioprospecting with focus on the challenges faced by bioprospecting in cold environments.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyMetagenomicsCold TemperatureComputational BiologyDiffusionDNAGelsGeologic SedimentsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMetagenomeSoilDNAGelsSoil

Identifiers

PMID25399309
PMCPMC4272415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.