ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015
Occurrence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica in the Beef Cattle Production and Processing Continuum.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, Phylogenetic Distribution, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Genetic Relatedness of Extraintestinal PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Regulation of intracellular proliferation of Salmonella typhimurium by CD63.Genes & genomics · 2025Article
- Methods for Screening and Isolating Extremely Heat-ResistantLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic analysis and antibiotic resistance ofVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Metaphylactic antimicrobial effects on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. measured longitudinally from feedlot arrival to harvest in high-risk beef cattle.Journal of applied microbiology · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study on Microbiological and Chemical Characteristics of Small Ruminant Carcasses from Abattoirs in Greece.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of Escherichia coli harboring colibactin genes (clb) isolated from beef production and processing systems.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Farm-to-Fork Quantitative Microbial Exposure Assessment of β-Lactam-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Genomic Diversity, Virulence Gene, and Prophage Arrays of Bovine and Human Shiga Toxigenic and EnteropathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Removal of antimicrobial prophylaxis and its effect on swine carriage of antimicrobial-resistant coliforms.Science progress · 2021Article
- Stockpiling versus Composting: Effectiveness in Reducing Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Resistance Genes in Beef Cattle Manure.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Effects of tissue-specific biomolecules on piglets after-weaning period.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from dairy cattle feces in Texas.PloS one · 2021Article
- A One Health Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Generic and Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Differentiates Presumptive Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase ProducingMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Genomic surveillance links livestock production with the emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella in Mexico.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019Article
- Quantitative dynamics of Salmonella and E. coli in feces of feedlot cattle treated with ceftiofur and chlortetracycline.PloS one · 2019Article
- Antibiotic-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in NontyphoidalMicrobiology spectrum · 2018Review
- Impact of "Raised without Antibiotics" Beef Cattle Production Practices on Occurrences of Antimicrobial Resistance.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specific concerns have been raised that third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC(r)) Escherichia coli, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant (COT(r)) E. coli, 3GC(r) Salmonella enterica, and nalidixic acid-resistant (NAL(r)) S. enterica may be present in cattle production environments, persist through beef processing, and contaminate final products. The prevalences and concentrations of these organisms were determined in feces and hides (at feedlot and processing plant), pre-evisceration carcasses, and final carcasses from three lots of fed cattle (n = 184). The prevalences and concentrations were further determined for strip loins from 103 of the carcasses. 3GC(r) Salmonella was detected on 7.6% of hides during processing and was not detected on the final carcasses or strip loins. NAL(r) S. enterica was detected on only one hide. 3GC(r) E. coli and COT(r) E. coli were detected on 100.0% of hides during processing. Concentrations of 3GC(r) E. coli and COT(r) E. coli on hides were correlated with pre-evisceration carcass contamination. 3GC(r) E. coli and COT(r) E. coli were each detected on only 0.5% of final carcasses and were not detected on strip loins. Five hundred and 42 isolates were screened for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) virulence-associated markers. Only two COT(r) E. coli isolates from hides were ExPEC, indicating that fed cattle products are not a significant source of ExPEC causing human urinary tract infections. The very low prevalences of these organisms on final carcasses and their absence on strip loins demonstrate that current sanitary dressing procedures and processing interventions are effective against antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.