Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398845›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

Immunotherapy for primary brain tumors: no longer a matter of privilege.

Peter E Fecci, Amy B Heimberger, John H Sampson

Abstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Multifunctional CuFrontiers in chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Malignant Spinal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. New Approaches to Glioblastoma.Annual review of medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Glioblastoma vaccine tumor therapy research progress.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2022
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter E FecciDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John H SampsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. john.sampson@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
Modulation of Microglia and T Cell Interactions in Malignant GliomaR01CA120813 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, GANESH · 2007 to 2025
$4.7M
Brain tumors with regulatory T-cells treated with EGFRvIII-specific T-cellsR01CA177476 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
EGFRvIII-targeted Bispecific T cell Engagers for brain tumorsR01NS085412 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Clinical Brain Tumor Development of a Cytomegalovirus-targeted Therapeutic with Vaccine pre-conditioning to Validate Novel Predictors of Vaccine EfficacyR01CA235612 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
NINDS Research Education Programs for Residents and Fellows in NeurosurgeryR25NS065731 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FECCI, PETER, HASAN, DAVID M. · 2009 to 2023
$968k
NCI NIH HHS CA1208113NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001NCI NIH HHS P50CA127001NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120813NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177476NCI NIH HHS R01CA177476NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235612NINDS NIH HHS NS085412NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085412NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065731NINDS NIH HHS R25NS065731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy for cancer continues to gain both momentum and legitimacy as a rational mode of therapy and a vital treatment component in the emerging era of personalized medicine. Gliomas, and their most malignant form, glioblastoma, remain as a particularly devastating solid tumor for which standard treatment options proffer only modest efficacy and target specificity. Immunotherapy would seem a well-suited choice to address such deficiencies given both the modest inherent immunogenicity of gliomas and the strong desire for treatment specificity within the confines of the toxicity-averse normal brain. This review highlights the caveats and challenges to immunotherapy for primary brain tumors, as well as reviewing modalities that are currently used or are undergoing active investigation. Tumor immunosuppressive countermeasures, peculiarities of central nervous system immune access, and opportunities for rational treatment design are discussed.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyBrain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicGlioblastomaHumansResearch DesignTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25398845
PMCPMC4235630
OpenAlexW2092618575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.