Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398732›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2014

Considerations on an approach for establishing a framework for bioactive food components.

Kathleen Ellwood, Douglas A Balentine, Johanna T Dwyer, John W Erdman, P Courtney Gaine, Catherine L Kwik-Uribe

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Perspective: Structure-Function Claims on Infant Formula.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  4. Scientific rigor and credibility in the nutrition research landscape.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen EllwoodCollege of Southern Maryland, La Plata, MD;
Douglas A BalentineUnilever, Englewood Cliffs, NJ;
Johanna T DwyerTufts University, Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Boston, MA;
John W ErdmanUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL;
P Courtney GaineNorth American Branch of the International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC; and.
Catherine L Kwik-UribeMars, Inc., Mclean, VA.
College of Southern Maryland · USInternational Life Sciences Institute India · INMars (United States) · USTufts University · USUnilever (United States) · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioactive food components have shown potential health benefits for more than a decade. Currently there are no recommended levels of intake [i.e., Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs)] as there are for nutrients and fiber. DRIs for essential nutrients were based on requirements for each specific nutrient to maintain normal physiologic or biochemical function and to prevent signs of deficiency and adverse clinical effects. They were later expanded to include criteria for reducing the risk of chronic degenerative diseases for some nutrients. There are many challenges for establishing recommendations for intakes of nonessential food components. Although some nonessential food components have shown health benefits and are safe, validated biomarkers of disease risk reduction are lacking for many. Biomarkers of intake (exposure) are limited in number, especially because the bioactive compounds responsible for beneficial effects have not yet been identified or are unknown. Furthermore, given this lack of characterization of composition in a variety of foods, it is difficult to ascertain intakes of nonessential food components, especially with the use of food-frequency questionnaires designed for estimating intakes of nutrients. Various intermediary markers that may predict disease outcome have been used as functional criteria in the DRI process. However, few validated surrogate endpoints of chronic disease risk exist. Nonvalidated intermediary biomarkers of risk may possibly predict clinical outcomes, but more research is needed to confirm the associations between cause and effect. One criterion for establishing acceptable intermediary outcome indicators may be the maintenance of normal physiologic function throughout adulthood, which presumably would lead to reduced chronic disease risk. Multiple biomarkers of outcomes that demonstrate the same health benefit may also be helpful. It would be beneficial to continue to refine the process of setting DRIs by convening a workshop on establishing a framework for nonessential food components that would take into consideration intermediary biomarkers indicative of optimal health.

Indexed as

Recommended Dietary AllowancesBiomarkersDietDietary FiberFunctional FoodHumansMicronutrientsNutrition AssessmentRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersDietary FiberMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID25398732
PMCPMC4224206
OpenAlexW2138461386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.