Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398701›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2014

Medication-related fall incidents in an older, ambulant population: the B-PROOF study.

Annelies C Ham, Karin M A Swart, Anke W Enneman, Suzanne C van Dijk, Sadaf Oliai Araghi, Janneke P van Wijngaarden, Nikita L van der Zwaluw, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma, Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten, Natasja M van Schoor and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Annelies C HamSection of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin M A Swart
Anke W Enneman
Suzanne C van Dijk
Sadaf Oliai Araghi
Janneke P van Wijngaarden
Nikita L van der Zwaluw
Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma
Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten
Natasja M van Schoor
Tischa J M van der Cammen
Paul Lips
Lisette C P G M de Groot
André G Uitterlinden
Renger F Witkamp
Bruno H Stricker
Nathalie van der Velde
Wageningen University & Research · NLErasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication use is a potentially modifiable risk factor for falling; psychotropic and cardiovascular drugs have been indicated as main drug groups that increase fall risk. However, evidence is mainly based on studies that recorded falls retrospectively and/or did not determine medication use at the time of the fall. Therefore, we investigated the associations indicated in the literature between medication use and falls, using prospectively recorded falls and medication use determined at the time of the fall.

methodsData from the B-PROOF (B-vitamins for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures) study were used, concerning community-dwelling elderly aged ≥65 years. We included 2,407 participants with pharmacy dispensing records. During the 2- to 3-year follow-up, participants recorded falls using a fall calendar. Cox proportional hazard models were applied, adjusting for potential confounders including age, sex, health status variables and concomitant medication use.

resultsDuring follow-up, 1,147 participants experienced at least one fall. Users of anti-arrhythmic medication had an increased fall risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.32) compared with non-users. Similarly, non-selective beta-blocker use was associated with an increased fall risk (HR 1.41 [95% CI 1.12-1.78]), while statin use was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.71-0.94]). Benzodiazepine use (HR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02-1.71]), and antidepressant use (HR 1.40 [95% CI 1.07-1.82]) were associated with an increased fall risk. Use of other cardiovascular and psychotropic medication was not associated with fall risk.

conclusionOur results strengthen the evidence for an increased fall risk in community-dwelling elderly during the use of anti-arrhythmics, non-selective beta-blockers, benzodiazepines, and antidepressant medication. Clinicians should prescribe these drugs cautiously and if possible choose safer alternatives for older patients.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsBenzodiazepinesFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHip FracturesHumansIncidenceIndependent LivingMaleNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID25398701
OpenAlexW1991070100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.