Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398614›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Local statistics allow quantification of cell-to-cell variability from high-throughput microscope images.

Louis-François Handfield, Bob Strome, Yolanda T Chong, Alan M Moses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational biology: deep learning.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis-François HandfieldDepartment of Computer Science, Department of Cell & Systems Biology and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Bob StromeDepartment of Computer Science, Department of Cell & Systems Biology and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Yolanda T ChongDepartment of Computer Science, Department of Cell & Systems Biology and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Alan M MosesDepartment of Computer Science, Department of Cell & Systems Biology and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada Department of Computer Science, Department of Cell & Systems Biology and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-119579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationQuantifying variability in protein expression is a major goal of systems biology and cell-to-cell variability in subcellular localization pattern has not been systematically quantified.

resultsWe define a local measure to quantify cell-to-cell variability in high-throughput microscope images and show that it allows comparable measures of variability for proteins with diverse subcellular localizations. We systematically estimate cell-to-cell variability in the yeast GFP collection and identify examples of proteins that show cell-to-cell variability in their subcellular localization.

conclusionsAutomated image analysis methods can be used to quantify cell-to-cell variability in microscope images.

Indexed as

Cell LineageModels, StatisticalDiagnostic ImagingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMicroscopy, FluorescenceProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25398614
PMCPMC4380034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.