Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398502›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2015

Automatic versus manual lymphocyte fixation: impact on dose estimation using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Christina Beinke, Matthias Port, Michael Abend

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina BeinkeBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstraße 11, 80937, Munich, Germany. christinabeinke@bundeswehr.org.
Matthias PortBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstraße 11, 80937, Munich, Germany.
Michael AbendBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstraße 11, 80937, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay is a biodosemeter for the exposure to ionizing radiation. We examined the feasibility to implement a fully automated cell harvesting system for binucleate lymphocyte (BN) fixation. We compared fully automated versus manual BN fixation and evaluated its relevance on the accuracy of dose estimates using the CBMN. First, dose-response curves based on X-ray irradiated blood samples of ten healthy donors (0-4 Gy, dose rate 1.0 Gy/min) were established. BN was either prepared manually or fully automatically using the Hanabi cell harvester system PII. Slides were finally scored following an automatic or semi-automatic approach using the Metafer4 platform. The variance was calculated per dose and separately for each of the four fixation and scoring combinations. Thereafter, a serial of 16 blood samples of unknown exposure doses (0-3.9 Gy X-ray) was analyzed. Employing the four fixation and scoring combinations, we compared the number of dose estimates lying outside the ±0.5 Gy interval and the mean absolute difference (MAD) and examined sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of doses merged into binary dose categories of clinical significance. Irrespective of the fixation procedure, we observed at doses ≤1.0 Gy about 2-4 times higher median variances for the automated scoring procedure over the semi-automated approach (p ≤ 0.03). The lowest median variance was observed for automatic fixation + semi-automated scoring (135) which was even 2 times lower relative to manual fixation + semi-automated scoring (276, p = 0.04). These differences became negligible after doses >1.0 Gy. For the automatic fixation procedure, we also observed a tendency toward borderline significant higher numbers of dose estimates falling into the ±0.5 Gy interval (25 %, p = 0.08) and lower MAD values (50 %, p = 0.09), which was predominantly caused by the accuracy of dose assessment >1.0 Gy. Regarding the discrimination of binary dose categories of clinical significance, we observed a good agreement of both fixation procedures. The implementation of the automatic cell harvesting system considerably reduces the workload and results in dose estimates with a tendency of being slightly more accurate as they are after a manual fixation.

Indexed as

CytokinesisDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansLymphocytesMicronucleus TestsRadiation DosageTissue and Organ Harvesting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.