ArticleImplementation science : IS2014
Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Using ERIC to Assess Implementation Science in Drowning Prevention Interventions in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of global health capacity building initiatives in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2020Pooled it
- Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of global health capacity building initiatives in low-to middle-income countries in the Middle East and North Africa region.Globalization and health · 2020Pooled it
- Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Testing a self-determination theory-based process model of physical activity behavior change in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomized controlled trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Trial
- Research to real-world impact: evidence-based knowledge mobilization to improve support for UK women veterans who have experienced military sexual trauma.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Can It Happen Again? Using Co-Produced Theatre to Explore the Challenges Faced by Couples Considering Pregnancy After a De Novo Genetic Diagnosis in a Child.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Embedding research in practice: enablers, challenges and pathways to sustainability for embedded health researchers in Canada.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Facilitators and challenges to implementing a researcher-in-residence model to build research capacity in adult social care.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Toward a proposal for a national strategy for access to outdoor stays in residential care facilities for older adults in Sweden.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Mobilising Knowledge for General Practice Decarbonisation: Maximising Impact Through a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Critically appraised topic (CAT) groups to improve the capability of healthcare staff to translate research findings into practice: A critical reflection.Health information and libraries journal · 2025Article
- Taking sides or bridging worlds? Managerial responses to conflicts and tensions between the core operations and the administration in healthcare.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Frailty Nexus: Community of practice for frailty researchers and healthcare professionals.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
- Lessons from using the Normalisation Process Theory to understand adherence to guidance on MgSOImplementation science communications · 2025Article
- The sustainability of health interventions implemented in Africa: an updated systematic review on evidence and future research perspectives.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- A scoping review of knowledge translation in strengthening health policy and practice: sources, platforms, tools, opportunities, and challenges.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Collaborative networks in community-based health and social care services: insights from Blackpool and the Fylde Coast (United Kingdom).Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Protocol: Effectiveness of Sexual and Reproductive Health Blended Learning Approaches for Capacity Strengthening of Health Professionals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations is often carried out through relatively short-term projects dependent on limited funding, which raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of implementation and improvement. It is becoming increasingly recognised that the translation of research evidence into practice has to be supported by developing the internal capacity of healthcare organisations to engage with and apply research. This process can be supported by external knowledge mobilisation initiatives represented, for instance, by professional associations, collaborative research partnerships and implementation networks. This conceptual paper uses empirical and theoretical literature on organisational learning and dynamic capabilities to enhance our understanding of intentional capacity building for knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations. DISCUSSION: The discussion is structured around the following three themes: (1) defining and classifying capacity building for knowledge mobilisation; (2) mechanisms of capability development in organisational context; and (3) individual, group and organisational levels of capability development. Capacity building is presented as a practice-based process of developing multiple skills, or capabilities, belonging to different knowledge domains and levels of complexity. It requires an integration of acquisitive learning, through which healthcare organisations acquire knowledge and skills from knowledge mobilisation experts, and experience-based learning, through which healthcare organisations adapt, absorb and modify their knowledge and capabilities through repeated practice. Although the starting point for capability development may be individual-, team- or organisation-centred, facilitation of the transitions between individual, group and organisational levels of learning within healthcare organisations will be needed. Any initiative designed to build capacity for knowledge mobilisation should consider the subsequent trajectory of newly developed knowledge and skills within the recipient healthcare organisations. The analysis leads to four principles underpinning a practice-based approach to developing multilevel knowledge mobilisation capabilities: (1) moving from 'building' capacity from scratch towards 'developing' capacity of healthcare organisations; (2) moving from passive involvement in formal education and training towards active, continuous participation in knowledge mobilisation practices; (3) moving from lower-order, project-specific capabilities towards higher-order, generic capabilities allowing healthcare organisations to adapt to change, absorb new knowledge and innovate; and (4) moving from single-level to multilevel capability development involving transitions between individual, group and organisational learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.