Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398424›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2015

Strategies for early stroke recovery: what lies ahead?

Tomoko Kitago, Randolph S Marshall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomoko KitagoColumbia University Medical Center, 710 W. 168th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA, tk2229@cumc.columbia.edu.
Randolph S Marshall
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementMost patients experience some degree of recovery after a stroke, but the majority of patients still have persistent impairments months later. Most recovery occurs early after a stroke, in the first few weeks to months, corresponding to a period of enhanced neuroplasticity. We are beginning to understand the mechanisms that underlie this recovery process, and how we can take advantage of this plasticity in designing rehabilitative interventions. In this review, we focus on recent behavioral, pharmacological, and brain stimulation strategies that have shown promise in augmenting stroke recovery. Several studies, both in animals and humans, suggest that early initiation and high doses of therapy are crucial for maximizing the benefits of rehabilitation. The investigation of early and intensive therapy in clinical trials has been limited, likely due to the logistical challenges of conducting such studies. Other strategies for promoting recovery seek to modulate neuroplasticity or to enhance the effects of rehabilitation, including the use of pharmacological agents, stem cell therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation. While there has been recent growth in stroke recovery and rehabilitation research, there is still a great need for more basic science and clinical research to further our understanding of the stroke recovery process and develop optimal rehabilitative strategies for promoting stroke recovery.

Identifiers

PMID25398424
OpenAlexW2052343187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.