Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398392›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2015

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing immediate and delayed catheter removal following uncomplicated hysterectomy.

Peng Zhang, Wan-Li Hu, Bei Cheng, Long Cheng, Xiao-Kan Xiong, Yang-Jun Zeng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02765893 (Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02765893 nacompletednot on this map

Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlantic Health SystemRan2015 to 2017Enrolled88ConditionsUrinary RetentionArmsNo Foley
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu load, Wuchang district, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
Wan-Li Hu
Bei Cheng
Long Cheng
Xiao-Kan Xiong
Yang-Jun Zeng
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CNHubei University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of an indwelling catheter after uncomplicated hysterectomy is common, but remains controversial because of the occurrence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) and discomfort.

objectiveTo examine the evidence on the benefits and harm from the use of an indwelling catheter after uncomplicated hysterectomy.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index up to July 2014 were searched for relevant RCTs and the reference lists of the included studies were also searched manually. REVIEW

methodsIncluded studies were RCTs comparing immediate and delayed catheter removal following uncomplicated hysterectomy without concomitant pelvic floor surgery. Two independent reviewers identified relevant RCTs, assessed their methodological quality and extracted data. Mantel-Haenszel estimates were calculated and pooled using a fixed or random effects model data are expressed as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsTen RCTs with a total of 1,188 patients that met the inclusion criteria were analysed. Early catheter removal was associated with a reduced risk of positive urine culture (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.88) and symptomatic UTI (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52). However, the incidence of recatheterization was lower among patients with delayed catheter removal (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.48 to 7.46). There was no significant difference in febrile morbidity associated with UTI between the two approaches (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.36). In addition, delayed catheter removal was associated with a longer time to first ambulation (standard mean difference -2.73, 95% CI -4.00 to -1.47].

conclusionsThe existing evidence from RCTs suggests that delayed catheter removal following uncomplicated hysterectomy increases the incidence of postoperative bacteriuria and symptomatic UTI but reduces the risk of recatheterization.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingDevice RemovalUrinary CathetersCatheterizationEarly AmbulationFemaleHumansHysterectomyPostoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsUrinary Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID25398392
OpenAlexW2082447426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.