ArticleCurrent microbiology2015
Genome sequence and phenotypic characterization of Caulobacter segnis.
Article in Current microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of biofilms in bacterial vaginosis by an amphoteric tenside pessary-clinical study and microbiota analysis.Microbiome · 2017Trial
- New Species ofViruses · 2026Article
- Upstream CtrA-binding sites both induce and repress pilin gene expression in Caulobacter crescentus.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- The genus Caulobacter and its role in plant microbiomes.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
- Both clinical and environmental Caulobacter species are virulent in the Galleria mellonella infection model.PloS one · 2020Article
- In silico prospection of microorganisms to produce polyhydroxyalkanoate from whey: Caulobacter segnis DSM 29236 as a suitable industrial strain.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Analyses of four new Caulobacter Phicbkviruses indicate independent lineages.The Journal of general virology · 2019Article
- Conservation of the Essential Genome Among Caulobacter and Brevundimonas Species.Current microbiology · 2016Article
- A comparison of the Caulobacter NA1000 and K31 genomes reveals extensive genome rearrangements and differences in metabolic potential.Open biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caulobacter segnis is a unique species of Caulobacter that was initially deemed Mycoplana segnis because it was isolated from soil and appeared to share a number of features with other Mycoplana. After a 16S rDNA analysis showed that it was closely related to Caulobacter crescentus, it was reclassified C. segnis. Because the C. segnis genome sequence available in GenBank contained 126 pseudogenes, we compared the original sequencing data to the GenBank sequence and determined that many of the pseudogenes were due to sequence errors in the GenBank sequence. Consequently, we used multiple approaches to correct and reannotate the C. segnis genome sequence. In total, we deleted 247 bp, added 14 bp, and changed 8 bp resulting in 233 fewer bases in our corrected sequence. The corrected sequence contains only 15 pseudogenes compared to 126 in the original annotation. Furthermore, we found that unlike Mycoplana, C. segnis divides by fission, producing swarmer cells that have a single, polar flagellum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.