Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398205›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2015

Morbidity and mortality in young-onset type 2 diabetes in comparison to type 1 diabetes: where are we now?

Jencia Wong, Maria Constantino, Dennis K Yue

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The p66International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a 7 Year Old Girl.International medical case reports journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hypertension and Diabetic Kidney Disease in Children and Adolescents.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers in Diabetic Retinopathy.The review of diabetic studies : RDS
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jencia WongRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital Diabetes Centre, Level 6 West, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia, jencia.wong@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Maria Constantino
Dennis K Yue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, we recognise that type 2 diabetes in youth is a disease with an aggressive time course and a significant complication risk. On the other hand, outcomes for youth with type 1 diabetes appear generally to be improving. With increasing numbers of both types of diabetes in youth, it is timely that a comparative perspective is offered to help clinicians prognosticate more appropriately. Contemporary comparative studies add a new perspective to a consistent story, that for youth-onset type 2 diabetes, the development and progression of cardio-renal complications are increased and the survival prognosis is significantly worse than for type 1 diabetes. Here, we review this mounting evidence, highlight the importance of metabolic syndrome factors in the excess risk and underscore that there remains a significant mortality gap for youth with either type of diabetes, to be addressed as a matter of urgency.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge of OnsetAlbuminuriaCardiovascular DiseasesChildDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic NephropathiesDiabetic NeuropathiesDisease ProgressionHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.