Observational studyPloS one2014
Delirium, sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit: a multinational, two-part survey among intensivists.
Observational study in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01278524 (International Multicenter Study One Day Prevalence Observational Study for Delirium on ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Multicenter Study One Day Prevalence Observational Study for Delirium on ICU
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Characteristics and Reported Practices of ICUs Participating in the Sedation, Analgesia and Delirium Management International Study: Variability in Site-Level Management of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Neuropsychiatric outcomes in sepsis: A vital sign worth monitoring.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Implementation of Evidence-Based International Recommendations Reduces Postoperative Delirium Rate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery or Interventions: A System-Based Quality Improvement Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Enhancing European Management of Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium: A Multinational, Prospective, Interventional Before-After Trial.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Challenges of the Implementation of a Delirium Rate Scale in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Observational
- The Profile of Early Sedation Depth and Clinical Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- The Usefulness of Quantitative Electroencephalography in Diagnosis and Severity Evaluation of Delirium: A Retrospective Study.Psychiatry investigation · 2023Article
- Sedation, sleep-promotion, and non-verbal and verbal communication techniques in critically ill intubated or tracheostomized patients: results of a survey.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- What are the perceptions of intensive care staff about their sedation practices when caring for a mechanically ventilated patient?: A systematic mixed-methods review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022Review
- [Pitfalls in the diagnosis of delirium].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Review
- [Delirium-assessment, prevention and treatment : Task in the interprofessional intensive care unit team].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Article
- Delirium on stroke units: a prospective, multicentric quality-improvement project.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Electroencephalography in delirium assessment: a scoping review.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Impact of a Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pre-post Cohort Study.Cureus · 2022Article
- Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Practices in sedation, analgesia, mobilization, delirium, and sleep deprivation in adult intensive care units (SAMDS-ICU): an international survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Annals of intensive care · 2022Article
- How We Prevent and Treat Delirium in the ICU.Chest · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analgesia, sedation and delirium management are important parts of intensive care treatment as they are relevant for patients' clinical and functional long-term outcome. Previous surveys showed that despite this fact implementation rates are still low. The primary aim of the prospective, observational multicenter study was to investigate the implementation rate of delirium monitoring among intensivists. Secondly, current practice concerning analgesia and sedation monitoring as well as treatment strategies for patients with delirium were assesed. In addition, this study compares perceived and actual practice regarding delirium, sedation and analgesia management. Data were obtained with a two-part, anonymous survey, containing general data from intensive care units in a first part and data referring to individual patients in a second part. Questionnaires from 101 hospitals (part 1) and 868 patients (part 2) were included in data analysis. Fifty-six percent of the intensive care units reported to monitor for delirium in clinical routine. Fourty-four percent reported the use of a validated delirium score. In this respect, the survey suggests an increasing use of delirium assessment tools compared to previous surveys. Nevertheless, part two of the survey revealed that in actual practice 73% of included patients were not monitored with a validated score. Furthermore, we observed a trend towards moderate or deep sedation which is contradicting to guideline-recommendations. Every fifth patient was suffering from pain. The implementation rate of adequate pain-assessment tools for mechanically ventilated and sedated patients was low (30%). In conclusion, further efforts are necessary to implement guideline recommendations into clinical practice. The study was registered (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01278524) and approved by the ethical committee.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.