Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25398065›Full record

ReviewMedicine2014

Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: epidemiology and impact of inappropriate empirical therapy.

Nicolò Girometti, Russell E Lewis, Maddalena Giannella, Simone Ambretti, Michele Bartoletti, Sara Tedeschi, Fabio Tumietto, Francesco Cristini, Filippo Trapani, Paolo Gaibani and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. IGNITE4: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Eravacycline vs Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Colonization of the gut byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A model for predicting bacteremia species based on host immune response.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Colistin: Lights and Shadows of an Older Antibiotic.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolò GiromettiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Surgery, Section of Infectious Diseases (NG, REL, MG, MB, ST, F. Tumietto, FC, F. Trapani, PV); Operative Unit of Microbiology (SA, PG); University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Russell E Lewis
Maddalena Giannella
Simone Ambretti
Michele Bartoletti
Sara Tedeschi
Fabio Tumietto
Francesco Cristini
Filippo Trapani
Paolo Gaibani
Pierluigi Viale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidrug resistance associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) among K. pneumoniae is endemic in southern Europe. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of resistance on the appropriateness of empirical therapy and treatment outcomes of K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections (BSIs) during a 2-year period at a 1420-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital in northern Italy. We identified 217 unique patient BSIs, including 92 (42%) KPC-positive, 49 (23%) ESBL-positive, and 1 (0.5%) metallo-beta-lactamase-positive isolates. Adequate empirical therapy was administered in 74% of infections caused by non-ESBL non-KPC strains, versus 33% of ESBL and 23% of KPC cases (p < 0.0001). To clarify the impact of resistance on BSI treatment outcomes, we compared several different models comprised of non-antibiotic treatment-related factors predictive of patients' 30-day survival status. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score determined at the time of positive blood culture was superior to other investigated models, correctly predicting survival status in 83% of the study cohort. In multivariate analysis accounting for APACHE II, receipt of inadequate empirical therapy was associated with nearly a twofold higher rate of death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.4; p = 0.02). Multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae accounted for two-thirds of all K. pneumoniae BSIs, high rates of inappropriate empirical therapy, and twofold higher rates of patient death irrespective of underlying illness.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingKlebsiella pneumoniaeAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaFemaleHumansKlebsiella InfectionsMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25398065
PMCPMC4602416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.