Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25397990›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2015

Fresh versus frozen engineered bone-ligament-bone grafts for sheep anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Vasudevan D Mahalingam, Nilofar Behbahani-Nejad, Elizabeth A Ronan, Tyler J Olsen, Michael J Smietana, Edward M Wojtys, Deneen M Wellik, Ellen M Arruda, Lisa M Larkin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypothermic and cryogenic preservation of tissue-engineered human bone.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vasudevan D Mahalingam1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nilofar Behbahani-Nejad1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Elizabeth A Ronan1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Tyler J Olsen2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michael J Smietana3Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Edward M Wojtys4Medsport Sports Medicine Program, Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Deneen M Wellik5Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ellen M Arruda2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lisa M Larkin1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical intervention is often required to restore knee instability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The most commonly used grafts for ACL reconstruction are tendon autografts or allografts. These current options, however, have shown failure rates requiring revision and continued instability in the long term. The mismatched biomechanical properties of the current tendon grafts compared with native ACL tissue are thought to contribute to these poor outcomes and potential risk of early onset osteoarthritis. As a possible solution to these issues, our laboratory has fabricated tissue-engineered ligament constructs that exhibit structural and functional properties similar to those of native ACL tissue after 6 months implantation. In addition, these tissue-engineered grafts achieve vascular and neural development that exceeds those of patellar tendon grafts. However, the utility of our tissue-engineered grafts is limited by the labor-intensive method required to produce the constructs and the need to use the constructs fresh, directly from the cell culturing system. Ideally, these constructs would be fabricated and stored until needed. Thus, in this study, we investigated the efficacy of freezing our tissue-engineered constructs as a method of preservation before use for ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that frozen constructs would have similar histological and biomechanical outcomes compared with our fresh model. Our results showed that 6 months postimplantation as an ACL replacement graft, both our tissue-engineered fresh and frozen grafts demonstrated similar mechanical and histological outcomes, indicating that freezing is a suitable method for preserving and storing our graft before ACL reconstruction. The ability to use frozen constructs significantly increases the versatility of our graft technology expanding the clinical utility of our graft.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate LigamentBone TransplantationFreezingGraft SurvivalAnimalsPreservation, BiologicalSheepTime FactorsTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID25397990
PMCPMC4442592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.