Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25396109›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2014

Anterior-only Partial Sacrectomy for en bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Hector Roldan, Luis F Perez-Orribo, Julio M Plata-Bello, Antonio I Martin-Malagon, Victor M Garcia-Marin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hector RoldanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Luis F Perez-OrriboDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Julio M Plata-BelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Antonio I Martin-MalagonDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Victor M Garcia-MarinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Universidad de La Laguna · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design Case report. Objective The usual procedure for partial sacrectomies in locally advanced rectal cancer combines a transabdominal and a posterior sacral route. The posterior approach is flawed with a high rate of complications, especially infections and wound-healing problems. Anterior-only approaches have indirectly been mentioned within long series of rectal cancer surgery. We describe a case of partial sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a locally advanced rectal cancer with invasion of the low sacrum through a combined transabdominal and perineal approach without any posterior incision. Methods Through a midline laparotomy, the tumor was dissected and the sacral osteotomy was performed. Once the sacrum was mobile, the muscular attachments to its posterior wall were cut through the perineal approach. This latter route was also used to remove the whole specimen. Results The postoperative period was uneventful in terms of infection and wound healing, but the patient developed right foot dorsiflexion paresis that completely disappeared in 1 month. Resection margins were negative. After a follow-up of 18 months, the patient has no local recurrence but presented lung and liver metastases. Conclusion In cases of rectal cancer involving the low sacrum, the combination of a transabdominal and a perineal route to carry out the partial sacrectomy is a feasible approach that avoids changes of surgical positioning and the morbidity related to posterior incisions. This strategy should be considered when deciding on undertaking partial sacrectomy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

abdominoperineal resectionabdominosacral resectionen bloc resectionpartial sacrectomyrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID25396109
PMCPMC4229377
OpenAlexW2043465276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.