Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25395986›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2014

Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002-2010.

Naomi J Anderson, David K Bonauto, Darrin Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cow-Related Injuries in Wisconsin During 2017-2023.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi J AndersonWashington State Department of Labor & Industries, Safety & Health Assessment & Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, PO Box 44330, Olympia, WA 98504-4330 USA.
David K BonautoWashington State Department of Labor & Industries, Safety & Health Assessment & Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, PO Box 44330, Olympia, WA 98504-4330 USA.
Darrin AdamsWashington State Department of Labor & Industries, Safety & Health Assessment & Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, PO Box 44330, Olympia, WA 98504-4330 USA.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U60 OH008487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Services Sector, as defined by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA), is comprised of a diverse industry mix and its workers face a variety of occupational exposures and hazards. The objective of this study was to identify high-risk industry groups within the Services Sector for prevention targeting.

methodsCompensable Washington State workers' compensation claims from the Services Sector from 2002 through 2010 were analyzed. A "prevention index" (PI), the average of the rank orders of claim count and claim incidence rate, was used to rank 87 Services Sector industry groups by seven injury types: Work- Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs), Fall to Lower Level, Fall on Same Level, Struck By/Against, Caught In/Under/Between, Motor Vehicle, and Overexertion. In the PI rankings, industry groups with high injury burdens appear higher ranked than industry groups with low counts or low rates of injury, indicating a need for prioritizing injury prevention efforts in these groups.

resultsIn the Services Sector, these 7 injury types account for 84% of compensable claims in WA. The industry groups highest ranked by PI across the injury types included: Services to Buildings and Dwellings; Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support; and Waste Collection. WMSDs had the highest compensable claims rates.

conclusionsServices is a large sector of the economy, and the substantial number, rate, and cost of occupational injuries within this sector should be addressed. Several Services Sector industry groups are at high risk for a variety of occupational injuries. Using a PI to rank industry groups based on their injury risk provides information with which to guide prevention efforts.

Indexed as

FallsMotor vehicleNORA sectorOccupational healthSafetySurveillanceTraumatic injuryWorkers’ compensationWork related musculoskeletal disorder

Identifiers

PMID25395986
PMCPMC4229604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.