Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25395488›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

The driving visual field and a history of motor vehicle collision involvement in older drivers: a population-based examination.

Carrie Huisingh, Gerald McGwin, Joanne Wood, Cynthia Owsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The influence of the topographic location of geographic atrophy on vision-related quality of life in nonexudative age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Visual functions associated with on-road performance by older drivers evaluated by a certified driving rehabilitation specialist.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carrie HuisinghDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Gerald McGwinDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Joanne WoodSchool of Optometry and Vision Science and Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Cynthia OwsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 2003 to 2020
$5.7M
Older Drivers: An Evidence-Basis for Licensure StandardsR01EY018966 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OWSLEY, CYNTHIA · 2008 to 2018
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018966NEI NIH HHS R01EY18966NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022838NIA NIH HHS P30AG22838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe designed a visual field test focused on the field utilized while driving to examine associations between field impairment and motor vehicle collision involvement in 2000 drivers aged 70 years or older.

methodsThe "driving visual field test" involved measuring light sensitivity for 20 targets in each eye, extending 15° superiorly, 30° inferiorly, 60° temporally, and 30° nasally. The target locations were selected on the basis that they fell within the field region utilized when viewing through the windshield of a vehicle or viewing the dashboard while driving. Monocular fields were combined into a binocular field based on the more sensitive point from each eye. Severe impairment in the overall field or a region was defined as average sensitivity in the lowest quartile of sensitivity. At-fault collision involvement for 5 years prior to enrollment was obtained from state records. Poisson regression was used to calculate crude and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) examining the association between field impairment and at-fault collision involvement.

resultsDrivers with severe binocular field impairment in the overall driving visual field had a 40% increased rate of at-fault collision involvement (RR, 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.83). Impairment in the lower and left fields was associated with elevated collision rates (RR, 1.40; 95% CI: 1.07-1.82 and RR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.15-1.92, respectively), whereas impairment in the upper and right field regions was not.

conclusionsResults suggest that older drivers with severe impairment in the lower or left region of the driving visual field are more likely to have a history of at-fault collision involvement.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityAccidents, TrafficAgedAged, 80 and overAutomobile DrivingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVisual FieldsVisual Field Testsagingdrivingvisual field

Identifiers

PMID25395488
PMCPMC4288142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.