ReviewDer Pathologe2014
[Molecular pathological diagnostics of infections in orthopedic pathology].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Histopathological diagnostics of infections in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Review
- Synovial Tissue Biopsy Collection by Rheumatologists: Ready for Clinical Implementation?Frontiers in medicine · 2019Review
- Are There Benefits In Early Diagnosis Of Prosthetic Joint Infection With Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction?Journal of bone and joint infection · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of infections in patients with arthritis and/or in joint prostheses requires interdisciplinary cooperation and the application of up-to-date methods. The histological investigation of the synovial membrane allows the differentiation of acute, chronic and granulomatous synovialitis. Detection of conserved regions of the microbial genome by PCR, especially 16S rRNA for bacteria and 18S rRNA for fungi, is a broad approach for the classification of pathogens which cannot be cultured. Acute infectious arthritis and periprosthetic infections share the spectrum of pathogens with sepsis, therefore multiplex PCR-based methods for the detection of sepsis can be employed. Molecular diagnostics can detect minimal infections in periprosthetic tissues even after antibiotic therapy. The anamnesis (enteral or urogenital infection), clinical picture (oligoarthritis) and further parameters (e.g. HLA B27 status) are important for the diagnosis of reactive arthritis. In many cases of reactive arthritis, molecular methods allow the detection of bacterial DNA or RNA in synovial fluid or tissue samples. The low sensitivity of histopathological methods may be compensated by application of PCR techniques, especially in the differential diagnosis of granulomatous synovitis including mycobacterial infections. Molecular methods can be used to support the differential diagnosis of septic and reactive arthritis. MicroRNA techniques combined with PCR for detection of pathogens support the differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with severe inflammatory activity compared to infectious arthritis. Proteomic methods could expand the methodological spectrum for the diagnosis of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.