Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394824›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2015

The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Patricia Documet, Todd M Bear, Jason D Flatt, Laura Macia, Jeanette Trauth, Edmund M Ricci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Personal Networks and Cervical Cancer Screening among Black Immigrant Women.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia DocumetUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA documetp@yahoo.com.
Todd M BearUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jason D FlattUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Laura MaciaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeanette TrauthUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Edmund M RicciUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000145 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$872k
A Collectivist Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening Among LatinosK07CA134635 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DOCUMET, PATRICIA ISABEL · 2009 to 2013
$670k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR000145NCI NIH HHS K07 CA134635NCI NIH HHS K07CA134635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparities in breast and cervical cancer screening by socioeconomic status persist in the United States. It has been suggested that social support may facilitate screening, especially among women of low socioeconomic status. However, at present, it is unclear whether social support enables mammogram and Pap test compliance. PURPOSE: This study examines the association between social support and compliance with mammogram and Pap test screening guidelines, and whether social support provides added value for women of low education.

methodData were from a countywide 2009-2010 population-based survey, which included records of 2,588 women 40 years and older (mammogram) and 2,123 women 21 to 65 years old (Pap test). Compliance was determined using the guidelines in effect at the time of data collection.

resultsSocial support was significantly related to mammogram (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [1.16, 1.77]) and Pap test (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [1.27, 2.29]) compliance after controlling for age, race, having a regular health care provider, and insurance status. The interaction between social support and education had a significant effect on Pap test compliance only among women younger than 40; the effect was not significant for mammogram compliance.

conclusionSocial support is associated with breast and cervical cancer screening compliance. The association between education and cancer screening behavior may be moderated by social support; however, results hold only for Pap tests among younger women. Practitioners and researchers should focus on interventions that activate social support networks as they may help increase both breast and cervical cancer screening compliance among women with low educational attainment.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial SupportAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth SurveysHumansMammographyMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPapanicolaou TestPatient Compliancebreast cancercancer prevention and screeninghealth behaviorhealth disparitieswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID25394824
PMCPMC4526257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.