Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394818›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

PC6 acupoint stimulation for the prevention of postcardiac surgery nausea and vomiting: a protocol for a two-group, parallel, superiority randomised clinical trial.

Marie Cooke, Claire Rickard, Ivan Rapchuk, Kiran Shekar, Andrea P Marshall, Tracy Comans, Suhail Doi, John McDonald, Amy Spooner

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marie CookeNHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions, Griffith Health Institute, Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Claire RickardNHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions, Griffith Health Institute, Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Ivan RapchukDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perfusion, Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Kiran ShekarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Andrea P MarshallGriffith Health Institute, Centre for Health Practice Innovation and Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Tracy ComansGriffith Health Institute, Population and Social Health Research Program, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Suhail DoiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
John McDonaldMicrobiology and Immunology Research Group, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-0069
Amy SpoonerCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith University · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUQueensland Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent but unwanted complications for patients following anaesthesia and cardiac surgery, affecting at least a third of patients, despite pharmacological treatment. The primary aim of the proposed research is to test the efficacy of PC6 acupoint stimulation versus placebo for reducing PONV in cardiac surgery patients. In conjunction with this we aim to develop an understanding of intervention fidelity and factors that support, or impede, the use of PC6 acupoint stimulation, a knowledge translation approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 712 postcardiac surgery participants will be recruited to take part in a two-group, parallel, superiority, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to receive a wrist band on each wrist providing acupressure to PC six using acupoint stimulation or a placebo. Randomisation will be computer generated, use randomly varied block sizes, and be concealed prior to the enrolment of each patient. The wristbands will remain in place for 36 h. PONV will be evaluated by the assessment of both nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics, quality of recovery and cost. Patient satisfaction with PONV care will be measured and clinical staff interviewed about the clinical use, feasibility, acceptability and challenges of using acupressure wristbands for PONV. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval will be sought from appropriate Human Research Ethics Committee/s before start of the study. A systematic review of the use of wrist acupressure for PC6 acupoint stimulation reported minor side effects only. Study progress will be reviewed by a Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) for nausea and vomiting outcomes at n=350. Dissemination of results will include conference presentations at national and international scientific meetings and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Study participants will receive a one-page lay-summary of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry--ACTRN12614000589684.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsCardiac Surgical ProceduresWristAcupressureHumansPostoperative Nausea and VomitingCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID25394818
PMCPMC4244418
OpenAlexW2107894108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.