ArticleBMJ open2014
Do weight perceptions among obese adults in Great Britain match clinical definitions? Analysis of cross-sectional surveys from 2007 and 2012.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and Disparities in Clinician Diagnosis of Overweight and Obesity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based obesity classification considering 3D body scanner measurements.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Understanding weight management experiences from patient perspectives: qualitative exploration in general practice.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- "Sometimes choices are not made, because we have 'a' choice, they're made because they are 'the' choice": Barriers to weight management for clients in rural general practice.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- The accuracy of patient-reported weight prior to total joint arthroplasty and arthroscopy of the lower extremity.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Individual-level barriers to bariatric surgery from patient and provider perspectives: A qualitative study.American journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Self-perception of overweight and obesity: A review of mental and physical health outcomes.Obesity science & practice · 2020Review
- Primary care patient and practitioner views of weight and weight-related discussion: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Weight control behaviors according to body weight status and accuracy of weight perceptions among Korean women: a nationwide population-based survey.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Blatant Dehumanization of People with Obesity.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2019Article
- Self-perceptions of body weight status according to age-groups among Korean women: A nationwide population-based survey.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Cardiometabolic Burden of Self-Perceived Obesity: A Multilevel Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample of Korean Adults.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and knowledge of maternal obesity: Reflecting on their experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women.Maternal & child nutrition · 2018Article
- OASIS: The Obesity Awareness and Insight Scale.Obesity medicine · 2018Article
- Overweight but unseen: a review of the underestimation of weight status and a visual normalization theory.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2017Review
- Does Knowing Hurt? Perceiving Oneself as Overweight Predicts Future Physical Health and Well-Being.Psychological science · 2017Article
- Overweight or about right? A norm comparison explanation of perceived weight status.Obesity science & practice · 2017Article
- The effect of a medical opinion on self-perceptions of weight for Mexican adults: perception of change and cognitive biases.BMC obesity · 2017Article
- Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage modifies the relationship between weight status and weight-related satisfaction.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2016Article
- Weight status misperceptions among UK adults: the use of self-reported vs. measured BMI.BMC obesity · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the proportion of the adult obese population in Great Britain who would describe their weight using the terms 'obese' and 'very overweight' in 2007 and 2012, and identify factors associated with more accurate weight perceptions.
designAnalysis of weight perception data from two population-based surveys.
settingPopulation surveys conducted in Great Britain.
participantsSurvey respondents (N=657) whose self-reported weight and height placed them in the obese category: body mass index (BMI) ≥30. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-identification using the terms 'obese' and 'very overweight'.
resultsThe proportion of obese adults selecting the term 'obese' to describe their body size was very low in both women (13% in 2007 and 11% in 2012) and men (4% in 2007 and 7% in 2012) and did not change significantly. Recognition of a substantial degree of overweight (as indexed by endorsement of either of the terms 'obese' or 'very overweight') declined substantially in women, from 50% in 2007 to 34% in 2012. It was not significantly changed in men (27% in 2007 and 23% in 2012). Having a higher BMI, and being able to identify the BMI threshold for obesity were associated with self-identifying as obese or very overweight.
conclusionsThe majority of the adult obese population of Great Britain do not identify themselves as either 'obese' or even 'very overweight'. Public health initiatives to tackle obesity are likely to be hampered by this lack of recognition of weight status. It is important to understand whether moves to increase personal awareness of weight status in the obese population can facilitate beneficial behaviour change, and what role health professionals can play in increasing awareness of weight status in obese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.