Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394816›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Do weight perceptions among obese adults in Great Britain match clinical definitions? Analysis of cross-sectional surveys from 2007 and 2012.

Fiona Johnson, Rebecca J Beeken, Helen Croker, Jane Wardle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Blatant Dehumanization of People with Obesity.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Overweight but unseen: a review of the underestimation of weight status and a visual normalization theory.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona JohnsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca J BeekenDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
Helen CrokerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
Jane WardleDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the proportion of the adult obese population in Great Britain who would describe their weight using the terms 'obese' and 'very overweight' in 2007 and 2012, and identify factors associated with more accurate weight perceptions.

designAnalysis of weight perception data from two population-based surveys.

settingPopulation surveys conducted in Great Britain.

participantsSurvey respondents (N=657) whose self-reported weight and height placed them in the obese category: body mass index (BMI) ≥30. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-identification using the terms 'obese' and 'very overweight'.

resultsThe proportion of obese adults selecting the term 'obese' to describe their body size was very low in both women (13% in 2007 and 11% in 2012) and men (4% in 2007 and 7% in 2012) and did not change significantly. Recognition of a substantial degree of overweight (as indexed by endorsement of either of the terms 'obese' or 'very overweight') declined substantially in women, from 50% in 2007 to 34% in 2012. It was not significantly changed in men (27% in 2007 and 23% in 2012). Having a higher BMI, and being able to identify the BMI threshold for obesity were associated with self-identifying as obese or very overweight.

conclusionsThe majority of the adult obese population of Great Britain do not identify themselves as either 'obese' or even 'very overweight'. Public health initiatives to tackle obesity are likely to be hampered by this lack of recognition of weight status. It is important to understand whether moves to increase personal awareness of weight status in the obese population can facilitate beneficial behaviour change, and what role health professionals can play in increasing awareness of weight status in obese patients.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSelf ReportAdultBody ImageBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomEPIDEMIOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25394816
PMCPMC4248082
OpenAlexW2153264543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.