Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394739›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

Effectiveness of switching to the rivastigmine transdermal patch from oral cholinesterase inhibitors: a naturalistic prospective study in Alzheimer's disease.

Annachiara Cagnin, Alberto Cester, Bruno Costa, Mario Ermani, Carlo Gabelli, Giuseppe Gambina, SWITCH study working group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dementia: What pharmacists need to know.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annachiara CagninDepartment of Neurosciences SNPSRR, University of Padova Medical School, Via Giustiniani 5, 35128, Padova, Italy, annachiara.cagnin@unipd.it.
Alberto Cester
Bruno Costa
Mario Ermani
Carlo Gabelli
Giuseppe Gambina
SWITCH study working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral donepezil and rivastigmine are two commonly used cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) used in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The rivastigmine transdermal patch formulation has high tolerability profile, allowing patients to achieve optimal therapeutic doses and providing potential advantages over oral ChEIs. This is a 6-month, multicentre, observational efficacy and tolerability study of switching from oral ChEIs to rivastigmine patch in AD patients who failed to show benefit from previous treatment. The reasons of the switch were: (1) lack/loss of benefit from previous oral ChEI treatment; (2) tolerability problems. The primary outcome was cognitive changes measured with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) test. Secondary outcomes were modifications of functional independence and behavioral disturbances and occurrence of adverse events (AEs) after switching. 174 patients, over 180 patients screened, entered the study (lack/loss of efficacy: 57 %, tolerability problems: 33 %, both reasons: 10 %). 6 months after switching 56 % of patients stabilized or increased the MMSE score respect to baseline. The only predictor of this outcome was the response at 3 months. In the group with lack/loss of response to oral ChEI, the decline of the MMSE score changed from -3.4 ± 2.5 points in the 6 months before switching to -0.5 ± 3.2 in the 6 months after the switch (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the IADL or NPI scores. Drug discontinuation rate was 20 %, due to AEs (18 %) and lack of compliance (2 %). Switching from an unsuccessful oral ChEI therapy to rivastigmine patch is effective and safe in more than half of the switched patients after a 6-month period.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsRivastigmineTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeCholinesterase InhibitorsRivastigmine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.