Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394559›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2014

Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review.

Lucylynn Lizarondo, Karen Grimmer, Saravana Kumar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Quality indicators in respiratory therapy.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. How to Improve the Drafting of Health Profiles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Delegating home visits in general practice: a realist review on the impact on GP workload and patient care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Review
  10. How Much Allied Health Therapy Care Is Enough? An Evidence Scan.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucylynn LizarondoInternational Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. Lucylynn.Lizarondo@unisa.edu.au.
Karen GrimmerInternational Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. Karen.Grimmer@unisa.edu.au.
Saravana KumarInternational Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. Saravana.Kumar@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerformance evaluation raises several challenges to allied health practitioners and there is no agreed approach to measuring or monitoring allied health service performance. The aim of this review was to examine the literature on performance evaluation in healthcare to assist in the establishment of a framework that can guide the measurement and evaluation of allied health clinical service performance. This review determined the core elements of a performance evaluation system, tools for evaluating performance, and barriers to the implementation of performance evaluation.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Five electronic databases were used to search for relevant articles: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Academic Search Premier. Articles which focussed on any allied health performance evaluation or those which examined performance in health care in general were considered in the review. Content analysis was used to synthesise the findings from individual articles.

resultsA total of 37 articles were included in the review. The literature suggests there are core elements involved in performance evaluation which include prioritising clinical areas for measurement, setting goals, selecting performance measures, identifying sources of feedback, undertaking performance measurement, and reporting the results to relevant stakeholders. The literature describes performance evaluation as multi-dimensional, requiring information or data from more than one perspective to provide a rich assessment of performance. A range of tools or instruments are available to capture various perspectives and gather a comprehensive picture of health care quality.

conclusionsEvery allied health care delivery system has different performance needs and will therefore require different approaches. However, there are core processes that can be used as a framework to evaluate allied health performance. A careful examination of barriers to performance evaluation and subsequent tailoring of strategies to overcome these barriers should be undertaken to achieve the aims of performance evaluation. The findings of this review should inform the development of a standardised framework that can be used to measure and evaluate allied health performance. Future research should explore the utility and overall impact of such framework in allied health service delivery.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAllied Health OccupationsAustraliaDelivery of Health CareEmployee Performance AppraisalHealth Services ResearchHumansQuality of Health CareState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID25394559
PMCPMC4234851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.