Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394419›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2014

Parietal neural prosthetic control of a computer cursor in a graphical-user-interface task.

Boris Revechkis, Tyson N S Aflalo, Spencer Kellis, Nader Pouratian, Richard A Andersen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boris RevechkisDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, MC 216-76, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Tyson N S Aflalo
Spencer Kellis
Nader Pouratian
Richard A Andersen

Funding

Smart MEMS recording systems for visual cortical studiesR01EY015545 · NEI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2005 to 2020
$9.6M
NEURAL PROSTHESIS USING POSTERIOR PARIETAL REACH REGIONR01EY013337 · NEI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2001 to 2015
$6.5M
Electrophysiologic and Anatomic Basis of BOLD fMRIK23EB014326 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI POURATIAN, NADER · 2012 to 2016
$946k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013337NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015545NIBIB NIH HHS K23 EB014326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo date, the majority of Brain-Machine Interfaces have been used to perform simple tasks with sequences of individual targets in otherwise blank environments. In this study we developed a more practical and clinically relevant task that approximated modern computers and graphical user interfaces (GUIs). This task could be problematic given the known sensitivity of areas typically used for BMIs to visual stimuli, eye movements, decision-making, and attentional control. Consequently, we sought to assess the effect of a complex, GUI-like task on the quality of neural decoding. APPROACH: A male rhesus macaque monkey was implanted with two 96-channel electrode arrays in area 5d of the superior parietal lobule. The animal was trained to perform a GUI-like 'Face in a Crowd' task on a computer screen that required selecting one cued, icon-like, face image from a group of alternatives (the 'Crowd') using a neurally controlled cursor. We assessed whether the crowd affected decodes of intended cursor movements by comparing it to a 'Crowd Off' condition in which only the matching target appeared without alternatives. We also examined if training a neural decoder with the Crowd On rather than Off had any effect on subsequent decode quality. MAIN

resultsDespite the additional demands of working with the Crowd On, the animal was able to robustly perform the task under Brain Control. The presence of the crowd did not itself affect decode quality. Training the decoder with the Crowd On relative to Off had no negative influence on subsequent decoding performance. Additionally, the subject was able to gaze around freely without influencing cursor position. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate that area 5d recordings can be used for decoding in a complex, GUI-like task with free gaze. Thus, this area is a promising source of signals for neural prosthetics that utilize computing devices with GUI interfaces, e.g. personal computers, mobile devices, and tablet computers.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural ProsthesesAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedMacaca mulattaMaleParietal LobePhotic StimulationPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID25394419
PMCPMC4381869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.