ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2014
Discovery of novel covalent proteasome inhibitors through a combination of pharmacophore screening, covalent docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Docking covalent targets for drug discovery: stimulating the computer-aided drug design community of possible pitfalls and erroneous practices.Molecular diversity · 2023Review
- Covalent docking in CDOCKER.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- Exploring EZH2-Proteasome Dual-Targeting Drug Discovery through a Computational Strategy to Fight Multiple Myeloma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cell-Based Optimization of Covalent Reversible Ketoamide Inhibitors Bridging the Unprimed to the Primed Site of the Proteasome β5 Subunit.ChemMedChem · 2019Article
- Computational Approaches for the Discovery of Human Proteasome Inhibitors: An Overview.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cellular protein processing and degradation. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have enormous potential to treat multiple myeloma, solid tumors, parasites, inflammation, and immune diseases, which is spurring the development of new types of PIs with enhanced efficacy, fewer side effects, and reduced drug resistance. Nevertheless, virtual screening for covalent PIs has rarely been reported because calculating the covalent binding energy is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to discover new covalent inhibitors of the 20S proteasome. The structures of PIs were manually divided into two parts: a noncovalent binding part resulting from virtual screening, and an epoxyketone group that was pre-selected as a covalent binding part. The SPECS database was screened by noncovalent docking and a pharmacophore model built with the 20S proteasome. After validating the covalent conjugation, 88 hits with epoxyketone were covalently docked into the 20S proteasome to analyze the intermolecular interactions. Four compounds were selected after multiple filtration and validations. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to check the stability of the noncovalent and covalent docked ligand-enzyme complexes and investigate the interaction patterns of the screened inhibitors. Finally, two compounds with novel aromatic backbones, reasonable interactions, and stable covalent binding modes were retained. These compounds can serve as potential hits for further biological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.