Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Yann C KlimentidisMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Jin ZhouMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Nathan E WineingerScripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
University of Arizona · USScripps Research Institute · US
Funding
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024156 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$53.0M
Scripps Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001114 · NCATS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2013 to 2017
$24.0M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) StudyR01HL071205 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROTTER, JEROME I · 2003 to 2007
$10.4M
Cigarette Smoke and Susceptibility to Influenza InfectionR01HL095163 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JASPERS, ILONA, NOAH, TERRY L · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
GWA for Gene-Environment Interaction Effects Influencing CHDU01HG004402 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A. · 2007 to 2009
$1.6M
Adjunctive Use of Apyrase to Fibrinolytic TherapyR44HL095169 · NHLBI · APT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI CHEN, RIDONG · 2012 to 2013
$1.3M
MESA Family StudyR01HL071250 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LIU, KIANG JOHN · 2003 to 2007
$991k
MESA Family StudyR01HL071258 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BURKE, GREGORY L · 2003 to 2007
$918k
MESA Family StudyR01HL071259 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POST, WENDY S · 2003 to 2007
Although over 60 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified by meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for type-2 diabetes (T2D) among individuals of European descent, much of the genetic variation remains unexplained. There are likely many more SNPs that contribute to variation in T2D risk, some of which may lie in the regions surrounding established SNPs--a phenomenon often referred to as allelic heterogeneity. Here, we use the summary statistics from the DIAGRAM consortium meta-analysis of T2D genome-wide association studies along with linkage disequilibrium patterns inferred from a large reference sample to identify novel SNPs associated with T2D surrounding each of the previously established risk loci. We then examine the extent to which the use of these additional SNPs improves prediction of T2D risk in an independent validation dataset. Our results suggest that multiple SNPs at each of 3 loci contribute to T2D susceptibility (TCF7L2, CDKN2A/B, and KCNQ1; p<5×10(-8)). Using a less stringent threshold (p<5×10(-4)), we identify 34 additional loci with multiple associated SNPs. The addition of these SNPs slightly improves T2D prediction compared to the use of only the respective lead SNPs, when assessed using an independent validation cohort. Our findings suggest that some currently established T2D risk loci likely harbor multiple polymorphisms which contribute independently and collectively to T2D risk. This opens a promising avenue for improving prediction of T2D, and for a better understanding of the genetic architecture of T2D.
Indexed as
AllelesDatabases, GeneticGenetic LociLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalePredictive Value of Tests
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Identification of allelic heterogeneity at type-2 diabetes loci and impact on prediction. · full record | OpenQuestion