Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25393777›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2014

Differential centrifugation-based biochemical fractionation of the Drosophila adult CNS.

Harald Depner, Janine Lützkendorf, Husam A Babkir, Stephan J Sigrist, Matthew G Holt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Active zone plasticity couples sleep need to presynaptic hypophosphorylation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. eLife · 2022
    Article
  11. A Non-Nuclear NF-κB Modulates Alcohol Sensitivity But Not Immunity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Translation of CircRNAs.Molecular cell · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harald DepnerInstitute for Biology - Genetics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Janine LützkendorfInstitute for Biology - Genetics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Husam A BabkirInstitute for Biology - Genetics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan J Sigrist1] Institute for Biology - Genetics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [2] NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Matthew G HoltLaboratory of Glia Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB) Center for the Biology of Disease, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila is widely used as a genetic model in questions of development, cellular function and disease. Genetic screens in flies have proven to be incredibly powerful in identifying crucial components for synapse formation and function, particularly in the case of the presynaptic release machinery. Although modern biochemical methods can identify individual proteins and lipids (and their binding partners), they have typically been excluded from use in Drosophila for technical reasons. To bridge this essential gap between genetics and biochemistry, we developed a fractionation method to isolate various parts of the synaptic machinery from Drosophila, thus allowing it to be studied in unprecedented biochemical detail. This is only possible because our protocol has unique advantages in terms of enriching and preserving endogenous protein complexes. The procedure involves decapitation of adult flies, homogenization and differential centrifugation of fly heads, which allow subsequent purification of presynaptic (and to a limited degree postsynaptic) components. It is designed to require only a rudimentary knowledge of biochemical fractionation, and it takes ∼3.5 h. The yield is typically 4 mg of synaptic membrane protein per gram of Drosophila heads.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemCentrifugationChemical FractionationDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHeadReproducibility of ResultsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionSynaptosomesWorkflowDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25393777
OpenAlexW1972530737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.