Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25393410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Different effects of adding white noise on cognitive performance of sub-, normal and super-attentive school children.

Suzannah K Helps, Susan Bamford, Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke, Göran B W Söderlund

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06065410 (Research Assistant Doctor), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06065410 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Research Assistant Doctor

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsBaseline, Intrinsic focus, White noise, environmental sound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Clinical effect of white noise combined with glucose in reducing the pain of retinopathy screening in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Specific Rhythm Auditory Stimulation for Attention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Preliminary Study on Speech in Noise Training in Children with Sensory Processing Disorder and Hyperacusis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  16. Sensory white noise in clinical ADHD: Who benefits from noise, and who performs worse?Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Effects of additive sensory noise on cognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. The Effects of White Noise on Attentional Performance and On-Task Behaviors in Preschoolers with ADHD.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzannah K HelpsInstitute for Disorders of Impulse and Attention, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Susan BamfordInstitute for Disorders of Impulse and Attention, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Edmund J S Sonuga-BarkeInstitute for Disorders of Impulse and Attention, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Experimental Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Göran B W SöderlundFaculty of Teacher Education and Sports, Sogndal University College, Sogndal, Norway.
University of Southampton · GBVestlandsforsking · NO

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT087749MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNoise often has detrimental effects on performance. However, because of the phenomenon of stochastic resonance (SR), auditory white noise (WN) can alter the "signal to noise" ratio and improve performance. The Moderate Brain Arousal (MBA) model postulates different levels of internal "neural noise" in individuals with different attentional capacities. This in turn determines the particular WN level most beneficial in each individual case-with one level of WN facilitating poor attenders but hindering super-attentive children. The objective of the present study is to find out if added WN affects cognitive performance differently in children that differ in attention ability.

methodsParticipants were teacher-rated super- (N = 25); normal- (N = 29) and sub-attentive (N = 36) children (aged 8 to 10 years). Two non-executive function (EF) tasks (a verbal episodic recall task and a delayed verbal recognition task) and two EF tasks (a visuo-spatial working memory test and a Go-NoGo task) were performed under three WN levels. The non-WN condition was only used to control for potential differences in background noise in the group testing situations.

resultsThere were different effects of WN on performance in the three groups-adding moderate WN worsened the performance of super-attentive children for both task types and improved EF performance in sub-attentive children. The normal-attentive children's performance was unaffected by WN exposure. The shift from moderate to high levels of WN had little further effect on performance in any group. SIGNIFICANCE: The predicted differential effect of WN on performance was confirmed. However, the failure to find evidence for an inverted U function challenges current theories. Alternative explanations are discussed. We propose that WN therapy should be further investigated as a possible non-pharmacological treatment for inattention.

Indexed as

NoiseAttentionChildCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSchools

Identifiers

PMID25393410
PMCPMC4231104
OpenAlexW2078467128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.