Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25393365›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

The BMP pathway either enhances or inhibits the Wnt pathway depending on the SMAD4 and p53 status in CRC.

P W Voorneveld, L L Kodach, R J Jacobs, C J M van Noesel, M P Peppelenbosch, K S Korkmaz, I Molendijk, E Dekker, H Morreau, G W van Pelt and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cells · 2025
    Article
  7. GSK3β Inhibitors Inhibit TGFβ Signaling in the Human Trabecular Meshwork.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AnMaterials today. Bio · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P W VoorneveldDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
L L KodachDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
R J JacobsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
C J M van NoeselDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M P PeppelenboschDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
K S KorkmazDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
I MolendijkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
E DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H MorreauDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
G W van PeltDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
W MeskerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
L J A C Hawinkels1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands [2] Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M PaauweDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H W VerspagetDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
D T GeraetsDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
D W Hommes1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands [2] Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
G J A OfferhausDepartment of Pathology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G R van den Brink1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands [2] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [3] Tytgat Institute for Liver & Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P Ten DijkeDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J C H HardwickDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLDDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstitutive Wnt activation is essential for colorectal cancer (CRC) initiation but also underlies the cancer stem cell phenotype, metastasis and chemosensitivity. Importantly Wnt activity is still modulated as evidenced by higher Wnt activity at the invasive front of clonal tumours termed the β-catenin paradox. SMAD4 and p53 mutation status and the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway are known to affect Wnt activity. The combination of SMAD4 loss, p53 mutations and BMP signalling may integrate to influence Wnt signalling and explain the β-catenin paradox.

methodsWe analysed the expression patterns of SMAD4, p53 and β-catenin at the invasive front of CRCs using immunohistochemistry. We activated BMP signalling in CRC cells in vitro and measured BMP/Wnt activity using luciferase reporters. MTT assays were performed to study the effect of BMP signalling on CRC chemosensitivity.

resultsEighty-four percent of CRCs with high nuclear β-catenin staining are SMAD4 negative and/or p53 aberrant. BMP signalling inhibits Wnt signalling in CRC only when p53 and SMAD4 are unaffected. In the absence of SMAD4, BMP signalling activates Wnt signalling. When p53 is lost or mutated, BMP signalling no longer influences Wnt signalling. The cytotoxic effects of 5-FU are influenced in a similar manner.

conclusionsThe BMP signalling pathway differentially modulates Wnt signalling dependent on the SMAD4 and p53 status. The use of BMPs in cancer therapy, as has been proposed by previous studies, should be targeted to individual cancers based on the mutational status of p53 and SMAD4.

Indexed as

Wnt Signaling Pathwaybeta CateninBone Morphogenetic ProteinsColorectal NeoplasmsHCT116 CellsHEK293 CellsHT29 CellsHumansSignal TransductionSmad4 ProteinTransfectionTumor Suppressor Protein p53beta CateninBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCTNNB1 protein, humanSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25393365
PMCPMC4453609
OpenAlexW2013827195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.