Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25392836›Full record

ReviewHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2014

Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Mario Zovak, Dubravka Mužina Mišić, Goran Glavčić

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a descriptive and comparative review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario ZovakDepartment of Surgery, University Clinical Hospital "Sisters of Charity", Zagreb, Croatia.
Dubravka Mužina MišićDepartment of Surgery, University Clinical Hospital "Sisters of Charity", Zagreb, Croatia.
Goran GlavčićDepartment of Surgery, University Clinical Hospital "Sisters of Charity", Zagreb, Croatia.
Sisters of Charity Hospital · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection of pancreatic cancer offers the only chance for prolonged survival. Pancretic resections are technically challenging, and are accompanied by a substantial risk for postoperative complications, the most significant complication being a pancreatic fistula. Risk factors for development of pancreatic leakage are now well known, and several prophylactic pharmacological measures, as well as technical interventions have been suggested in prevention of pancreatic fistula. With better postoperative care and improved radiological interventions, most frequently complications can be managed conservatively. This review also attempts to address some of the controversies related to optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Indexed as

pancreatic anastomosisPancreatic cancerpancreatic fistulapancreatic resectiontotal pancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID25392836
PMCPMC4207843
OpenAlexW2177146954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.